VS

Ford Ranger vs Skoda Scala comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Skoda Scala?

Ford Ranger vs Skoda Scala: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • substantially more power
  • significantly more efficient
details

Skoda Scala

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Scala is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,011 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Skoda Scala with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

Scala

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers substantially more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Scala is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.2 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 447 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Scala is substantially lighter – 1,199 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,206 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 558 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Ford Ranger
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Scala

The Skoda Scala is a tidy, no-nonsense hatch that wraps clever packaging and composed manners into a compact, grown-up package. It’s the sensible choice for buyers who want everyday practicality with a dash of style and personality—no drama, just reliable charm.

details
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114931
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114932
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114933
Der neue SKODA SCALA Interieur_114994

Reviews Skoda Scala

4.8 (9 Reviews)
rate
Herr der Ringe
22 Jun 2026, 13:30:53

Sporty with plenty of space, slightly larger than the Golf 7

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jose Ant.
1 Feb 2026, 04:13:05

The Scala is roomier inside than it looks, and very agile on both the highway and in town — ideal for practical, family use. It also uses less fuel.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Karoq
Skoda Scala
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Karoq and the Skoda Scala comes down to whether you need an SUV’s space and higher driving position or a compact hatchback that’s sharper on fuel and nimble in town. The Karoq offers more practical cargo and passenger room plus available all-wheel drive, while the Scala …
Skoda Scala
VW Golf
VS
In one corner the Skoda Scala — clever, spacious and gloriously sensible; in the other the VW Golf — the benchmark hatchback that smooths out imperfections and keeps resale values healthy. Which one deserves your driveway: the Scala’s no-nonsense practicality and lower price, or the Golf’s polish, …
Skoda Scala
VW Taigo
VS
The Skoda Scala and the VW Taigo are two popular compact choices: the Scala a roomy, value-focused hatchback and the Taigo a style-led small crossover with a higher driving position. This comparison concentrates on space, comfort, driving character, economy and features to help you pick whether you …
Audi A3 Sportback
Skoda Scala
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the Skoda Scala are both excellent options for those seeking a compact yet versatile ride, each showcasing their respective brand’s strengths. The A3 Sportback offers a more premium experience with refined interiors and advanced technology, but comes with a higher price …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T90 EV
VS
Ford Ranger and Maxus T90 EV go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Maxus …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Scala
VS
In the increasingly competitive compact crossover segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to younger buyers seeking fun and functionality. Conversely, the Skoda Scala offers a more traditional hatchback experience, prioritizing practicality …
SEAT Leon
Skoda Scala
VS
Choosing between the SEAT Leon and the Skoda Scala is essentially choosing between a sportier, more driver-focused hatch and a practical, value-minded compact. Both share similar underpinnings and tech, so pick the Leon for sharper styling and handling or the Scala for better interior space, …
Skoda Scala
VW T-Cross
VS
Skoda Scala and VW T-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Scala or the VW …
Ford Ranger
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
21,400 - 31,500 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
114 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,199 - 1,271 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
467 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
403 - 431 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.