VS

Ford Transit Bus vs Mazda 3 Hatchback comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 24,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or Mazda 3 Hatchback?

Ford Transit Bus vs Mazda 3 Hatchback: Key differences

Ford Transit Bus

details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • significantly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Bus

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Hatchback is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Bus costs 50,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,952 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 3 Hatchback uses 5.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Transit Bus with 9.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.

3 Hatchback

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers moderately more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Bus delivers clearly more torque with 390 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Transit Bus

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly lighter – 1,419 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 919 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers substantially more boot space – 351 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 351 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries substantially more – 1,162 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 677 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,500
3 Hatchback

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Ford Transit Bus
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Bus

The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.

details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
Ford Transit Bus
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption

Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
Price
24,500 - 35,500 £
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
245 - 248 g/km
co2
126 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Bus
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
9
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
Curb weight
1,419 - 1,549 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
Length
-
Width
2,059 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
Payload
470 - 485 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.