Compare performance (150 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 24,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or Mazda 3 Hatchback?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda 3 Hatchback is significantly cheaper – starting at 24,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Bus costs 50,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,952 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 3 Hatchback uses 5.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Transit Bus with 9.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers moderately more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Bus delivers clearly more torque with 390 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly lighter – 1,419 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 919 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers substantially more boot space – 351 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 351 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries substantially more – 1,162 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 677 kg.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.
detailsThe Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
|
Price
24,500 - 35,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
245 - 248 g/km
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
|
Curb weight
1,419 - 1,549 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
|
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
|
Payload
470 - 485 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|