Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mazda 3 Hatchback – Which one offers the better deal?
Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Mazda 3 Hatchback.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda 3 Hatchback has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24500 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 223 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.60 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
3 Hatchback
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback has a slight edge – offering 186 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Hatchback performs slight better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is barely noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1419 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs distinct better – up to 1283 L, which is about 257 L more than the Mazda 3 Hatchback.
When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Hatchback minimal takes the win – 485 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mazda 3 Hatchback shows itself to be has the upper hand and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,500
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Mazda 3 Hatchback
The Mazda 3 Hatchback presents a sleek and modern design, capturing attention with its streamlined curves and dynamic stance. Inside, the interior showcases high-quality materials and an intuitive layout, providing comfort and ease for both driver and passengers. On the road, this hatchback impresses with its agile handling and responsive performance, making it a practical yet stylish choice for urban and suburban driving.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Hatchback
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
24500 - 35500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1419 - 1549 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4460 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1795 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1435 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1022 - 1026 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
470 - 485 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
199 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.