VS

Ford Puma vs Mazda 3 Hatchback comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 24,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda 3 Hatchback?

Ford Puma vs Mazda 3 Hatchback: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • only slightly more power

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 24,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 634 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

3 Hatchback

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers only slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers somewhat more torque with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is barely lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,419 kg. The difference is around 103 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries barely more – 485 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
24,500 - 35,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
126 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,419 - 1,549 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
470 - 485 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.