VS

Ford Puma vs Skoda Epiq comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 211 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 22,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Epiq?

Ford Puma vs Skoda Epiq: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more efficient
  • clearly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Skoda Epiq

  • marginally cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • marginally more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Epiq is marginally cheaper – starting at 22,200 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,714 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is marginally more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 13.7 kWh/100km for the Skoda Epiq. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Epiq offers marginally more range – reaching up to 440 km, about 23 km more than the Ford Puma.

Epiq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Epiq offers markedly more power – delivering 211 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Epiq is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 290 Nm.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,625 kg. The difference is around 309 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 475 L. That’s a difference of about 48 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries only slightly more – 469 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Epiq is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,200
Epiq

Skoda Epiq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 211 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 310 - 440 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Skoda Epiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Epiq

The Skoda Epiq is a sensible, well-packaged compact SUV that delivers a roomy cabin, practical storage and an easygoing driving character suited to everyday life. It prioritizes comfort and value with smart, user-friendly features rather than flashy performance.

details
113_skoda_epiq_58690d36-1920x1280
114_skoda_epiq_ff280ddc-1920x1281
040_skoda_epiq_dd6d8412-1920x1281
036_skoda_epiq_dc424056-1920x1440
041_skoda_epiq_9207c105-1920x1281
042_skoda_epiq_8c0688b5-1920x1457
048_skoda_epiq_8179f162-1920x1690

Reviews Skoda Epiq

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.Polo
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the VW ID. Polo and the Skoda Epiq to help you decide which one fits your driving needs and budget. I’ll cut through the spec sheets and focus on real-world driving, interior space, tech and running costs so you can pick with confidence.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
VW ID.3
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Epiq pits two compact electric hatchbacks against each other: both suit city drivers and small families but prioritise different strengths. The ID.3 leans toward a refined, tech-focused driving experience, while the Epiq emphasises practical space, clever packaging and …
Skoda Elroq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the Skoda Elroq and the Skoda Epiq helps you weigh practical, compact crossover usability against a more spacious, tech-focused alternative from Skoda. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, efficiency, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the one that fits your needs.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
CUPRA Raval
Skoda Epiq
VS
The Cupra Raval vs Skoda Epiq comparison places a sporty, driver-focused compact crossover against a sensible, practical contender aimed at everyday usability. I’ll break down performance, interior quality, technology and running costs so you can decide which one fits your priorities.
Ford Puma
Skoda Epiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
22,200 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
310 - 440 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,625 - 1,642 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
475 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
438 - 455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 211 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
267 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 155 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.