Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Vauxhall Astra – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Vauxhall Astra fits your lifestyle better.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Vauxhall Astra costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 420 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Vauxhall Astra manages with 2.20 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 3.20 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Vauxhall Astra with 15.40 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.30 kWh.
As for range, the Vauxhall Astra performs somewhat better – achieving up to 419 km, about 43 km more than the Ford Puma.
Astra
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Astra has a distinct edge – offering 225 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Vauxhall Astra takes 7.50 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Vauxhall Astra performs to a small extent better – reaching 235 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Vauxhall Astra pulls a bit stronger with 360 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is barely noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1341 kg. The difference is around 25 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 101 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Vauxhall Astra performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1339 L, which is about 56 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Vauxhall Astra minimal takes the win – 509 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Vauxhall Astra proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Vauxhall Astra is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £25,200
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Vauxhall Astra
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Vauxhall Astra
The Opel Astra strikes a neat balance between everyday practicality and engaging handling, so the daily grind suddenly feels a bit less dull. Inside it's intelligently packaged with modern kit and comfortable seating, making it a very sensible pick for buyers who want a dependable hatchback that doesn't take itself too seriously.
details
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Astra
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
25200 - 40500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.2 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.40 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
82 - 419 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 52 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1341 - 1736 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
352 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4374 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1432 - 1488 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1268 - 1339 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
414 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 225 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 235 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 165 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, C, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.