Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Skoda Kamiq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the thriving automotive market, two compact SUVs are vying for attention: the Ford Puma and Skoda Kamiq. Both models boast an array of features and advancements, but how do they stack up against one another? This comparison will delve into their technical specifications, innovations, and overall appeal to potential buyers.
Starting with design, both the Ford Puma and the Skoda Kamiq exhibit a modern, SUV-inspired aesthetic. The Puma measures between 4186 mm to 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and 1550 to 1555 mm in height, offering a sporty look with versatile practicality.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kamiq is slightly larger, measuring 4241 mm in length, 1793 mm in width, and 1562 mm in height. The Kamiq’s design leans heavily on Skoda's signature sharp lines and bold front grille, emphasizing an assertive road presence.
When it comes to performance, both vehicles offer a range of engine options. The Ford Puma boasts several petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) and electric engines, ranging from 125 HP to a powerful 168 HP. Its efficient powertrains contribute to fuel consumption rates between 5.4 L/100km and 6 L/100km, along with an impressive electric range of up to 376 km.
In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq relies on conventional petrol engines with outputs ranging from 95 HP to a robust 150 HP. The Kamiq is slightly less fuel-efficient, with consumption figures generally between 5.4 L/100km and 5.7 L/100km. While the Kamiq may not have hybrid options, its performance remains commendable, especially with its 0-100 km/h acceleration timing as quick as 8.3 seconds.
Both models come equipped with front-wheel drive and offer a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. Ford Puma presents an automated dual-clutch transmission option, enhancing driving smoothness and responsiveness. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kamiq impresses with a reliable manual gearbox or a similarly efficient automatic variant, appealing to those who enjoy a more engaging driving experience.
The interiors of the Ford Puma and Skoda Kamiq are designed with a focus on driver comfort and technology integration. The Puma features a spacious trunk capacity ranging from 456 L to 523 L, accommodating lifestyle demands seamlessly. In addition, its cabin is adorned with modern infotainment systems that incorporate the latest connectivity options, such as smartphone integration and advanced driver assistance features.
Conversely, the Skoda Kamiq offers a slightly smaller trunk capacity at 400 L, but its design emphasizes practicality with clever storage solutions throughout the cabin. Skoda's infotainment systems are intuitive and feature-rich, providing a user-friendly interface that enhances the driving experience.
Safety is paramount in both vehicles. Ford equips the Puma with advanced driver assistance technologies, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assistance, and automated emergency braking. These features enhance safety on the road, instilling confidence in the driver.
Similarly, the Skoda Kamiq does not fall short, offering a variety of safety features like pedestrian detection and a suite of airbags. Additionally, its robust construction and advanced stability systems ensure high safety ratings in crash tests.
In conclusion, the choice between the Ford Puma and Skoda Kamiq ultimately depends on individual preferences. The Puma may appeal to those seeking hybrid options and modern technology features, while the Kamiq stands strong with its conventional performance and practical interior. Both vehicles offer an enjoyable driving experience and cater to the growing demand for compact SUVs.
With their unique strengths and market appeal, the Ford Puma and Skoda Kamiq are certainly worthy contenders in the compact SUV segment, promising style, comfort, and innovation to their drivers.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Kamiq has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 3060 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kamiq manages with 5.30 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a a bit edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.10 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs slight better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls a bit stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 85 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1395 L, which is about 112 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq slightly takes the win – 539 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
Overall, the Skoda Kamiq shows itself to be performs better in key areas and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4241 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1793 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1562 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España