VS

Ford Puma vs Skoda Kamiq comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Kamiq?

Ford Puma vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Skoda Kamiq

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By

Puma

Ford Puma VS Skoda Kamiq — quick take

Ford Puma VS Skoda Kamiq pits a playful, driver-focused compact SUV against a quietly practical, space-first contender. The Ford Puma leans into sporty handling, flashy infotainment and a uniquely practical boot solution, while the Skoda Kamiq trades showmanship for roomy rear seats, simple ergonomics and low running fuss. That contrast frames most real-world decisions: choose engagement and clever loadspace, or prioritize passenger comfort and everyday ease. Below we break down how those tendencies feel day to day and which buyer each car will suit better.

Kamiq

Character and driving experience

The Ford Puma feels alive on twisty roads — steering is sharp and the chassis encourages enthusiastic inputs, which makes short commutes feel entertaining. The Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, delivers a composed, confidence-inspiring ride that rewards relaxed driving with minimal fuss rather than thrills. In town the Puma’s three‑cylinder personality and a double‑clutch gearbox can call attention to themselves, whereas the Kamiq’s demeanor is calmer and more insulated from engine buzz. If you value steering precision and a go‑cart vibe pick the Puma; if you want predictable, low‑stress progress pick the Kamiq.

Puma

Comfort and long-distance behavior

On long runs the Skoda Kamiq generally wins for overall serenity: quieter cabin, gentler suspension tuning and a back seat that keeps grown-ups comfortable for hours. The Ford Puma’s front seats are supportive and well suited to spirited driving, but the firmer setup and narrower rear make extended family trips less relaxed for those in the back. Both cope with motorway cruising well, yet the Puma’s engine character becomes more noticeable under load while the Kamiq maintains a more composed soundtrack. Choose the Puma if you want driver engagement without sacrificing front-seat endurance; pick the Kamiq if rear-passenger comfort and low cabin noise matter most.

Kamiq

Practicality and everyday usability

Practical differences are tangible: the Ford Puma shines with clever load solutions that make wet or muddy gear easy to stow and clean, turning awkward items into a non-issue. The Skoda Kamiq offers a very usable trunk and a generally more conventional load floor, but it can feel less deep and often shows a higher lip or step that complicates loading bulky items. Inside, the Kamiq favours straightforward switches and rotary climate controls that reduce distraction, while the Puma bundles modern screens and fewer physical buttons — a perk for tech lovers but an annoyance if you prefer tactile controls. Families who juggle sports kit and wet boots will like the Puma’s thinking; those who prioritize simple, predictable luggage handling will appreciate the Kamiq.

Puma

City friendliness and everyday ergonomics

Both cars are compact enough for urban life, yet they approach city driving differently: the Ford Puma’s agility and tight turn-in make it feel nimble in traffic and when threading into parking spots. The Skoda Kamiq trades a touch of agility for superior outward visibility, easier sightlines and a cockpit that lets you operate climate and basic functions without hunting through menus. In tight maneuvers the Puma’s rear visibility can be hindered by thick pillars, so you’ll rely more on cameras and sensors; the Kamiq’s clearer glass area gives you more natural confidence while parking. If you live where parking and quick maneuvers dominate, the Kamiq’s ergonomic clarity will reduce daily friction, whereas the Puma rewards drivers who enjoy steering and tech as part of the city experience.

Kamiq

Who should pick which car — buyer fit and trade-offs

If you prioritise driving enjoyment, a standout, washable loadspace and up‑to‑date infotainment, the Ford Puma is the better emotional and practical fit; it will suit solo commuters, active couples and tech‑minded buyers who accept a tighter rear seat. If your priorities are rear‑seat space, low real‑world running costs, straightforward controls and relaxed long-distance manners, the Skoda Kamiq is the pragmatic choice for families and sensible buyers. Expect trade-offs: the Puma gives personality and clever stowage at the expense of some rear comfort and traditional controls, while the Kamiq offers calm, usable space and ergonomics over sporting flair. Read the technical comparison next to see how those real‑world differences map to drivetrain, cargo and equipment choices for your specific needs.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kamiq is marginally cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,646 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kamiq uses 5.3 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Kamiq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers a bit more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers a bit more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is barely lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 85 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries a bit more – 539 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
Raphael
14 Aug 2026, 13:38:47

A great car. I’ve now been driving it for 20,000 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Reg
19 Jul 2026, 13:56:09

Roomy nice ride well made reliable very good value

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo? Both are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers, but the Kamiq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value while the Taigo favors sporty styling and a slightly sharper driving feel—this comparison will help you choose which suits your needs.
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you want compact, city-friendly practicality or a more modern, feature-focused package. This brief comparison highlights the key differences in space, efficiency, tech and driving character so you can decide which suits your …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Skoda Kamiq and Skoda Karoq are compact SUVs from the same family but aimed at different buyers: the Kamiq is city-friendly and efficient, while the Karoq offers more space, capability and refinement. This short comparison will help you decide whether the Kamiq’s nimble practicality or the …
Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
VS
The Ford Puma and the VW T‑Roc are two top choices in the compact crossover segment, but they deliver different strengths — the Puma leans sporty and driver-focused while the T‑Roc prioritises space and refinement. This quick comparison will highlight how their performance, practicality and tech …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.