Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Kamiq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 21700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Kamiq?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Kamiq has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3060 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kamiq manages with 5.30 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Kamiq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a a bit edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.10 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kamiq performs slight better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls a bit stronger with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is barely noticeable lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 85 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kamiq performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1395 L, which is about 112 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq slightly takes the win – 539 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be performs better in key areas and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Skoda Kamiq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Ford Puma
Skoda Kamiq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
21700 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4241 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1793 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1562 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.