@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
VS

Ford Puma vs Nissan Micra – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Nissan Micra fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Micra has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24000 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 780 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Nissan Micra with 14.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.10 kWh.

As for range, the Nissan Micra performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 416 km, about 40 km more than the Ford Puma.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a slightly edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Nissan Micra takes 8 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs distinct better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Nissan Micra tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is a bit lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1452 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers distinct more room – 523 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 197 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – up to 1283 L, which is about 177 L more than the Nissan Micra.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slightly takes the win – 469 kg compared to 408 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Puma proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Puma is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,800
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.

details

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
Nissan Micra
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
24000 - 29900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
317 - 416 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
40 - 52 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1452 - 1527 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
3974 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1774 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1490 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
403 - 408 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
150 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Bayon
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon both offer compelling choices for urban drivers. The Ford Puma is praised for its sporty handling and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who enjoy a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Bayon …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.