VS

Ford Puma vs Nissan Micra comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Nissan Micra?

Ford Puma vs Nissan Micra: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • barely more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

Nissan Micra

4.2 (2 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Achim Sedelmaier
Puma

Quick take: Ford Puma VS Nissan Micra — a compact crossover against a city-focused EV

The Ford Puma and the Nissan Micra arrive from different philosophies: the Puma as a cheeky, sportier compact crossover and the Micra as a calm, pragmatic electric city car. If you search for a playful driving experience and unusually clever cargo solutions, the Ford Puma signals that agenda; the Nissan Micra instead trades drama for smoothness, simple logic and electric refinement. Both cars aim at urban life but approach it from opposite directions — one leans performance-flavored, the other leans low-effort efficiency. This piece lays out how those choices feel every day, so you can match character and practicality to your routine. Read on to see which model suits your priorities before diving into the numbers and specs.

Micra

Driving character: sporty agility versus relaxed electric manners

The Ford Puma feels lively on twisty roads with quick turn-in and a suspension setup that rewards confident inputs, so it’s the pick for drivers who enjoy being engaged behind the wheel. The Nissan Micra, as an EV, is noticeably quieter and delivers linear, effortless acceleration with one-pedal control that makes stop‑and‑go traffic less fatiguing. Where the Puma communicates more through the chassis and sometimes transmits mechanical noise at low revs, the Micra prioritizes serenity and a composed ride. In short drives or spirited commutes the Puma entertains; in daily urban runs the Micra reduces stress and simplifies operation. Your choice here is a trade-off between involvement (Puma) and relaxed efficiency (Micra).

Puma

Comfort and long-distance behavior: firmer focus vs cushioned calm

On longer trips the Ford Puma’s supportive front seats and taut chassis keep drivers planted and focused, but its firmer suspension and tighter rear can become tiring for passengers over many hours. The Nissan Micra soaks up imperfections more politely and keeps cabin noise low, which translates into less fatigue on extended drives even when rear passengers have limited legroom. The Puma will feel brisk and composed on motorways, while the Micra will feel more refined and less work-intensive over the same distance — though charging stops will influence real-world travel rhythm. If daily long runs are your norm, the Micra’s relaxed demeanor wins on comfort; if you want a car that remains lively after several hours, the Puma will please the driver. Consider whether you prioritize passenger comfort or driver engagement for your typical journeys.

Practical daily usability: MegaBox cleverness versus straightforward EV packaging

The Ford Puma stands out with a very usable boot idea that makes loading awkward items and wet gear easier, turning city chores and active-lifestyle kit into a no-fuss task. The Nissan Micra’s luggage area is sensible for shopping and weekend bags, but a higher sill and a less flat folding arrangement make bulky loading less convenient than the Puma’s solution. Both cars struggle with true rear-seat spaciousness for tall adults, yet the Puma tends to feel more flexible for carrying gear while the Micra focuses on tidy, predictable EV storage. For people who lug sports equipment, muddy boots or awkward boxes regularly, the Puma’s cargo practicality will feel like a real advantage. For simple urban errands and commuter packs, the Micra’s layout is perfectly adequate and easier to live with every day.

Cabin feel, tech and perceived quality: bold screens vs intuitive Google integration

The Ford Puma’s interior announces itself with large displays and a modern cockpit, but a move toward fewer physical controls makes some basic operations feel less tactile and can be fussy on the move. The Nissan Micra keeps its cabin straightforward with Google-built infotainment that feels familiar and intuitive, and controls that make daily tasks quick to complete. Both cabins show cost-conscious material choices in places, yet the Puma leans sportier in presentation while the Micra opts for pragmatic calm and logical software. If flashy screens and a sportier ambience matter, the Puma wins on presence; if ease of use and a quiet, ordered interface are your priorities, the Micra’s approach will feel more reassuring. Perceived quality thus depends on whether you value modern flair or practical ergonomics.

Buyer fit and trade-offs: who should choose which car next

Choose the Ford Puma if you want a compact crossover that brings driver engagement, a genuinely clever cargo mind-set and a bolder on-road personality — it’s a better match for active owners who value fun and utility over rear-seat space. Opt for the Nissan Micra if you prioritise calm, quiet daily driving, straightforward EV operation and a softer ride that reduces fatigue on routine commutes; it’s tailored to city-centric buyers who want simplicity and comfort. Both cars ask you to accept compromises in rear passenger room, but the nature of those compromises differs: the Puma trades some comfort for versatility and zest, while the Micra trades outright cargo convenience for serenity and ease. These practical, lifestyle contrasts lead naturally into the technical section, where powertrain, range and charging behavior clarify which trade-offs will matter most to your driving patterns.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Puma is barely cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Nissan Micra costs 24,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 77 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is barely more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.2 kWh/100km for the Nissan Micra. That’s a difference of about 1.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers barely more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 1 km more than the Nissan Micra.

Micra

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers moderately more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Nissan Micra takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers somewhat more torque with 290 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is a bit lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,452 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries a bit more – 469 kg compared to 408 kg. That’s a difference of about 61 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Nissan Micra

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.

details
serpimg_LJ8L9f

Reviews Nissan Micra

4.2 (2 Reviews)
rate
Franz
29 Jul 2026, 13:54:54

The Nissan drives quietly and feels very grown-up. The fit and finish are good, too. It offers very fair value for money. However, the rear space is rather unsuitable for tall people.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Skoda Epiq
VS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Epiq is a matchup between a compact, city-oriented crossover and a more conventional Skoda SUV offering (marketed here as the Epiq). This comparison focuses on what matters to real buyers: space, practicality, driving feel, running costs and which car suits which type of …
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia XCeed are two of the sharper compact crossovers on the market, each mixing car-like driving manners with useful everyday practicality. This comparison looks at driving dynamics, interior quality, space and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your lifestyle.
Ford Puma
Opel Astra
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Vauxhall Astra comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with a sporty, raised stance or a more conventional family hatch with roomy practicality. The Puma brings a higher driving position and clever cargo solutions, while the Astra focuses on space, …
Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
VS
The Ford Puma and the VW T‑Roc are two top choices in the compact crossover segment, but they deliver different strengths — the Puma leans sporty and driver-focused while the T‑Roc prioritises space and refinement. This quick comparison will highlight how their performance, practicality and tech …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
Nissan Micra

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
24,000 - 29,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
317 - 416 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,452 - 1,527 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,774 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
403 - 408 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.