Compare performance (150 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or VW Caddy?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW Caddy is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Bus costs 50,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,741 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Transit Bus with 9.4 L/100km. The difference is about 8.9 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
Both models deliver identical power – 150 HP each.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Bus delivers moderately more torque with 390 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 7.
In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy is considerably lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 763 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries noticeably more – 1,162 kg compared to 710 kg. That’s a difference of about 452 kg.
The VW Caddy is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.
detailsThe VW Caddy is the Swiss-army knife of compact vans — practical, surprisingly refined, and ready to swap a weekend adventure for a grocery run without breaking a sweat. It’s user-friendly, comfortable enough for daily driving, and sensible for buyers who want utility with a dash of style and no drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
|
Price
27,800 - 45,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
116 - 121 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
|
co2
245 - 248 g/km
|
co2
10 - 165 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,998 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
|
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
|
Height
1,819 - 1,860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,556 - 3,700 L
|
|
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
|
Payload
501 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 14 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
173 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|