Compare performance (122 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (35,800 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Townstar or VW Caddy?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to versatile high roof wagons, the Nissan Townstar and VW Caddy are among the top contenders. Both vehicles are loaded with features designed to meet the multifaceted needs of families and businesses alike. In this article, we dive into a detailed comparison of these two models, focusing on their technical aspects and innovations.
The Nissan Townstar offers multiple powertrain options, including an electric version with 122 HP and two petrol variants producing 130 HP. This provides a choice between sustainability and traditional internal combustion power. The electric version stands out with a 45 kWh battery and an impressive range of 285 km for those looking to minimize their carbon footprint.
In contrast, the VW Caddy comes with a diverse selection of petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrid engines, offering up to 150 HP. This makes it an excellent choice for drivers seeking flexibility between fuel types. Its hybrid model offers an electric range of up to 120 km, making it a viable choice for eco-conscious urban travel.
Both the Townstar and Caddy provide several transmission options. The Townstar features automatic, manual, and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, while the Caddy mirrors these offerings but adds a notable advantage with the availability of both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, broadening its appeal to those who may face diverse driving conditions.
The Nissan Townstar’s electric edition boasts a consumption rate of 19.2 kWh/100 km and a CO2 efficiency class ranging from A to F for its non-electric models. Its petrol version consumes between 6.7 and 7 L/100 km, depending on the specific configuration.
The Caddy, with its broader range of engine options, sees fuel consumption figures between 5.3 and 6.9 L/100 km for its combustion engines. Its hybrid model is particularly efficient, offering a combined consumption of only 0.5 L/100 km when used primarily in electric mode, classified within efficiency classes E to B.
With both vehicles offering five doors, they provide easy access to spacious interiors designed to accommodate between five and seven passengers, as available in the Caddy. The Townstar provides a trunk capacity of up to 775 liters, slightly more than the Caddy’s maximum of 703 liters. This makes the Townstar particularly appealing for those who prioritize cargo space.
While the Townstar measures between 4488 mm and 4911 mm in length, the Caddy spans from 4500 mm to 4853 mm. Both have similar widths and heights, providing comparable space and headroom for passengers and cargo. Given its payload capacities range from 498 kg to 641 kg for the Townstar and 501 kg to 710 kg for the Caddy, the Caddy may serve better for those needing higher payloads.
The choice between the Nissan Townstar and VW Caddy ultimately hinges on individual needs. If maximizing cargo space and preferring an all-electric option are high on your checklist, the Townstar makes a compelling case. However, if a wider array of engine choices and the option for all-wheel drive are decisive factors, the Caddy might just edge out the competition. Regardless of choice, both vehicles deliver excellent value and flexibility, catering to the modern driver's needs.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW Caddy is markedly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Nissan Townstar costs 35,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,086 £.
As for electric range, the Nissan Townstar offers clearly more range – reaching up to 265 km, about 144 km more than the VW Caddy.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Caddy offers somewhat more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Caddy is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 11.4 s, while the Nissan Townstar takes 13.3 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Caddy delivers clearly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 75 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy is markedly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 2,041 kg. The difference is around 466 kg.
When it comes to payload, the VW Caddy carries moderately more – 710 kg compared to 594 kg. That’s a difference of about 116 kg.
The Nissan Townstar is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Townstar is a pragmatic city companion that blends clever packaging with a calm, easygoing drive, making it ideal for urban errands and small-business hauls. It won't win any style contests, but its tidy interior, sensible features and no-nonsense character make it a genuinely useful buy for people who value practicality over pizzazz.
details
The VW Caddy is the Swiss-army knife of compact vans — practical, surprisingly refined, and ready to swap a weekend adventure for a grocery run without breaking a sweat. It’s user-friendly, comfortable enough for daily driving, and sensible for buyers who want utility with a dash of style and no drama.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,800 - 37,700 £
|
Price
27,800 - 45,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
265 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 121 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
10 - 165 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,041 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,998 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,556 - 3,700 L
|
|
Payload
594 kg
|
Payload
501 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 14 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
173 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España