VS

Dacia Jogger vs VW Caddy – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Dacia Jogger or VW Caddy fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jogger @ dacia-presse.de

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Dacia Jogger has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £, while the VW Caddy costs 27800 £. That’s a price difference of around 12339 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Caddy manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Dacia Jogger with 4.70 L. The difference is about 4.20 L per 100 km.

Caddy @ vwpress

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Caddy has a slight edge – offering 150 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Dacia Jogger is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 9.80 s, while the VW Caddy takes 11.40 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW Caddy performs minimal better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Dacia Jogger tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW Caddy pulls distinct stronger with 320 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm difference.

Jogger @ dacia-presse.de

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In curb weight, Dacia Jogger is clearly perceptible lighter – 1251 kg compared to 1575 kg. The difference is around 324 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the VW Caddy performs convincingly better – up to 3700 L, which is about 1881 L more than the Dacia Jogger.

When it comes to payload, VW Caddy somewhat takes the win – 710 kg compared to 582 kg. That’s a difference of about 128 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW Caddy shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £27,800
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife

VW Caddy

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 6.9 L
  • Electric Range : 116 - 121 km
details

Dacia Jogger

The Dacia Jogger offers a spacious and versatile interior, making it an excellent choice for families seeking practicality and comfort. Its design combines the robustness of an SUV with the functionality of an estate, providing a reliable option for various driving needs. With a focus on affordability, the Jogger ensures that essential features are accessible without compromising on quality.

details
d220423p @ dacia-presse.de
d220425p @ dacia-presse.de
d230002p @ dacia-presse.de
d220421p @ dacia-presse.de

VW Caddy

The VW Nutzfahrzeuge Caddy Hochdach-Kombi is a versatile choice for those seeking extra space and practicality in their everyday vehicle. With its functional high roof and adaptable interior, it easily accommodates both passengers and cargo. The Caddy also stands out with its modern design and features aimed at providing comfort and convenience on the road.

details
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27320-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27309-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27313-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress

Similar Comparisons

Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Dacia Duster
Dacia Jogger
VS
The Dacia Duster is the rugged, no-nonsense compact SUV that feels ready for gravel tracks and weekend escapes without costing the earth — pick it if you want a bit of adventure in a brutally honest, affordable package. The Dacia Jogger, by contrast, is a clever, spacious seven-seater that trades off-road bravado for family-friendly practicality and impressive value, perfect if you need seats and cargo rather than swagger.
Dacia Jogger
VW Caddy
Jogger
Caddy

Costs and Consumption
Price
15400 - 23400 £
Price
27800 - 45900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 7.8 L
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
116 - 121 km
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
105 - 137 g/km
co2
10 - 165 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 50 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
MPV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1251 - 1460 kg
Curb weight
1575 - 1998 kg
Trunk capacity
160 - 607 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4547 mm
Length
4500 - 4853 mm
Width
1784 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
1674 mm
Height
1819 - 1860 mm
Max trunk capacity
1807 - 1819 L
Max trunk capacity
2556 - 3700 L
Payload
393 - 582 kg
Payload
501 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, LPG, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 140 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.8 - 13.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 14 s
Max Speed
167 - 174 km/h
Max Speed
173 - 186 km/h
Torque
160 - 200 Nm
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
67 - 103 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
Brand
Dacia
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Toyota Proace City
VW Caddy
VS
In the competitive van market, the Toyota Proace City and VW Caddy stand out with their blend of practicality and performance. The Proace City impresses with its reliability and customizable cargo options, making it a great choice for business users. Meanwhile, the VW Caddy offers a more refined driving experience and advanced tech features, appealing to those who prioritize comfort alongside utility.
Ford Transit Connect
VW Caddy
VS
In the competitive segment of compact vans, the Ford Transit Connect and VW Caddy stand out for their practicality and versatility. The Transit Connect boasts a spacious interior and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for urban deliveries. Meanwhile, the VW Caddy offers a refined driving experience and advanced safety features, appealing to businesses seeking a reliable partner on the road.
VW Touran
VW Caddy
VS
When comparing the VW Touran and VW Caddy, it's clear that both models excel in practicality, but they cater to slightly different needs. The Touran offers a more family-oriented design with a spacious interior and versatile seating arrangements, making it ideal for those who prioritize passenger comfort. In contrast, the Caddy stands out as a robust commercial vehicle, boasting impressive cargo capacity and flexibility, which appeals to business users and those requiring a workhorse for everyday tasks.
Ford Tourneo Connect
VW Caddy
VS
In the competitive segment of compact vans, the Ford Tourneo Connect stands out for its impressive versatility and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for families and businesses alike. Meanwhile, the VW Caddy impresses with its robust build quality and refined interior, which prioritize comfort and practicality. Both models offer unique strengths, but the right choice ultimately depends on personal preferences and specific needs.
Dacia Jogger
Peugeot 5008
VS
The Dacia Jogger and Peugeot 5008 represent two distinct approaches to family transport, each with its own strengths. The Jogger impresses with its affordability and practical design, making it an excellent choice for budget-conscious consumers. In contrast, the Peugeot 5008 offers a more premium experience, featuring advanced technology and a refined interior, appealing to those seeking a touch of luxury in their everyday drive.
Dacia Jogger
Renault Symbioz
VS
In a captivating comparison between the Dacia Jogger and the Renault Symbioz, the focus shifts from practicality to innovation. While the Jogger impresses with its spaciousness and value for money, the Symbioz showcases cutting-edge technology and sustainability features that appeal to the modern eco-conscious driver. Both vehicles reflect their brands' distinct philosophies, catering to different market segments while highlighting the versatility of the automotive landscape.
Ford Tourneo Courier
VW Caddy
VS
In the compact van arena, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers a more budget-friendly approach with its practical design and efficient use of space, ideal for urban adventurers and small businesses alike. On the other hand, the VW Caddy stands out with its robust build quality and versatile engine lineup, appealing to those seeking a touch of refinement in their utility vehicle. Both models present compelling choices, yet the decision ultimately hinges on whether one values economy and simplicity or prefers engineering sophistication and variety under the hood.
Dacia Jogger
Vauxhall Combo
VS
What drivetrain options does the Dacia Jogger have?

The Dacia Jogger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.