Compare performance (122 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is visibly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,631 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
Both models deliver identical power – 122 HP each.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Transit Connect is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.4 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers a bit more torque with 320 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is barely lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,639 kg. The difference is around 64 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries a bit more – 901 kg compared to 780 kg. That’s a difference of about 121 kg.
The Renault Kangoo Compact Van comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
-
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Payload
670 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|