Compare performance (150 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (26,700 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is somewhat cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 26,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,284 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Transit Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 4.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers considerably more range – reaching up to 290 km, about 172 km more than the Ford Transit Connect.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Connect offers a bit more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Transit Connect is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.4 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Ford Transit Connect is only slightly faster – reaching 186 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers markedly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is barely lighter – 1,477 kg compared to 1,493 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers markedly more capacity – up to 4,900 L, about 1,200 L more than the Ford Transit Connect.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries a bit more – 901 kg compared to 792 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.
The Ford Transit Connect stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,700 - 41,500 £
|
Price
22,400 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
270 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 153 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,477 - 1,866 kg
|
Curb weight
1,493 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,500 - 4,868 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,910 mm
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
1,856 - 1,860 mm
|
Height
1,854 - 1,864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,900 L
|
|
Payload
602 - 792 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
280 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|