Compare performance (218 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (50,800 £ vs 57,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Mercedes Marco Polo?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Transit Custom Bus is moderately cheaper – starting at 50,800 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,689 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers very slightly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers clearly more torque with 630 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 4.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
194 - 218 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
670 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,140 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,975 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
555 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|