Compare performance (218 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (50,800 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Volvo V60?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Transit Custom Bus is very slightly cheaper – starting at 50,800 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 624 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers markedly more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 132 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers marginally more torque with 630 Nm compared to 589 Nm. That’s about 41 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,800 - 63,000 £
|
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
99 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
45 - 141 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
460 - 506 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|