Compare performance (286 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (49,700 £ vs 57,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Transporter or Mercedes Marco Polo?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Transit Custom Transporter is a bit cheaper – starting at 49,700 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,811 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers moderately more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 49 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Transporter delivers visibly more torque with 630 Nm compared to 500 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 4.
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Transit Custom is a clever, no-nonsense workhorse that blends roomy practicality with surprisingly car-like driving manners, so your workday feels less like a chore and more like efficient transport. With a sensible interior, smart storage and tidy handling, it’s the kind of van that makes owners smile while they get on with the job — reliable, unfussy and built to keep moving.
detailsThe Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,700 - 77,400 £
|
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
194 - 218 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
670 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,140 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,975 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
555 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|