Compare performance (269 HP vs 400 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Audi A3 Sportback?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi A3 Sportback is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,309 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 261 km more than the Audi A3 Sportback.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers clearly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers moderately more torque with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Audi A3 Sportback holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Audi
|