Compare performance (269 HP vs 517 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 64,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or BYD Tang?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
BYD Tang is marginally cheaper – starting at 64,300 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,024 £.
As for electric range, the BYD Tang offers clearly more range – reaching up to 530 km, about 128 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang offers substantially more power – delivering 517 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 248 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Tang delivers noticeably more torque with 680 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: BYD Tang offers more seats – 7 vs 6.
The BYD Tang is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
64,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
530 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,630 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
235 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,955 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
575 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
517 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
680 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
380 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
BYD
|