Compare performance (269 HP vs 171 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or GWM ORA 03?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
GWM ORA 03 is substantially cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33,889 £.
As for electric range, the GWM ORA 03 offers barely more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 18 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers visibly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 98 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers considerably more torque with 430 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 180 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
GWM
|