Compare performance (269 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (39,900 £ vs 36,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes Vito Bus?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes Vito Bus is barely cheaper – starting at 36,300 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,603 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Vito Bus uses 6.7 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Transit Transporter is clearly more efficient: consuming 21.3 kWh/100km compared to 26.7 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Vito Bus. That’s a difference of about 5.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 32 km more than the Mercedes Vito Bus.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers slightly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes Vito Bus is moderately faster – reaching 140 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Bus delivers somewhat more torque with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mercedes Vito Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 6.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Vito Bus is only slightly lighter – 2,023 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 51 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more capacity – up to 14,100 L, about 9,110 L more than the Mercedes Vito Bus.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Transporter carries significantly more – 2,607 kg compared to 1,077 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,530 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes Vito is a sturdy, no-nonsense people carrier that blends commercial practicality with a surprisingly civilised cabin, making long shuttles feel less like a chore. If you need a dependable transporter that swallows luggage, forgives hard use and still looks a touch more premium than a plain van, the Vito is an easy, sensible pick.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,900 - 73,000 £
|
Price
36,300 - 55,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 10 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
26.7 - 26.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
248 - 370 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 228 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
8
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,765 kg
|
Curb weight
2,023 - 2,739 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
580 - 1,390 L
|
|
Length
5,531 - 6,704 mm
|
Length
4,895 - 5,370 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,778 mm
|
Height
1,890 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9,300 - 14,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
4,190 - 4,990 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2,607 kg
|
Payload
726 - 1,077 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
330 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,019 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|