Compare performance (269 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 57,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes Marco Polo?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes Marco Polo is slightly cheaper – starting at 57,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,824 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers somewhat more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers a bit more torque with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 4.
The Ford Transit Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
194 - 218 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
670 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,140 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,975 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
555 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|