Compare performance (269 HP vs 816 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 112,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes SL Class?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Transit Transporter is considerably cheaper – starting at 67,300 £ , while the Mercedes SL Class costs 112,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 45,395 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers substantially more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 390 km more than the Mercedes SL Class.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes SL Class offers significantly more power – delivering 816 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 547 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes SL Class delivers substantially more torque with 1,420 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 990 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 4.
The Ford Transit Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes SL blends timeless elegance with a cheeky sense of occasion, its retractable roof turning any commute into a small celebratory parade. Behind the wheel it behaves like a grown-up sports car that prefers comfort and presence over headline-grabbing bravado, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want to arrive in style.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
112,700 - 219,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
9 - 13.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
12 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
206 - 309 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Roadster
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,195 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
110 - 240 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,915 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
145 - 375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plug-in Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
435 - 816 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 1,420 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
320 - 600 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,991 - 3,982 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|