Compare performance (269 HP vs 288 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 40,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or MG Marvel R?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG Marvel R is clearly cheaper – starting at 40,300 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,032 £.
The electric range is almost identical – both manage about 402 km on a single charge.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG Marvel R offers marginally more power – delivering 288 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Marvel R delivers visibly more torque with 665 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 235 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The MG Marvel R is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe MG Marvel R combines striking, futuristic styling with a surprisingly spacious, gadget-packed cabin, giving shoppers a sharply styled electric alternative that punches above its price. It may not carry luxury-badge prestige, but it delivers honest daily usability and enough charisma to tempt buyers who want electric flair without the premium tax.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
40,300 - 43,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
370 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
66.1 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 1,920 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
357 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,674 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,919 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,396 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
453 - 478 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
180 - 288 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
410 - 665 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
132 - 212 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2021
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MG
|