Compare performance (269 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 42,136 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers markedly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 118 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers visibly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
670 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|