Compare performance (269 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (39,900 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,493 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van uses 5.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is somewhat more efficient: consuming 18.7 kWh/100km compared to 21.3 kWh/100km for the Ford Transit Transporter. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers markedly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 112 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van is visibly faster – reaching 176 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 56 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers visibly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly lighter – 1,493 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 581 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more capacity – up to 14,100 L, about 9,200 L more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Transporter carries substantially more – 2,607 kg compared to 901 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,706 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,900 - 73,000 £
|
Price
22,400 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
270 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,765 kg
|
Curb weight
1,493 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,531 - 6,704 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,910 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,778 mm
|
Height
1,854 - 1,864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9,300 - 14,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,900 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2,607 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,019 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|