Compare performance (269 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Skoda Superb Limousine?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Superb Limousine is substantially cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,252 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers considerably more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 262 km more than the Skoda Superb Limousine.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers barely more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers only slightly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Skoda Superb is the quietly imposing saloon that turns everyday practicality into tasteful luxury, with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and a boot that swallows groceries and luggage with military discipline. For buyers who want executive presence without the badge snobbery, it’s a clever, polished choice that rewards sensible thinking with genuine comfort and pragmatic charm.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
35,100 - 52,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
131 - 140 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
26 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,559 - 1,896 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
486 - 645 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
441 - 580 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|