Compare performance (269 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Volvo EX90?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Transit Transporter is only slightly cheaper – starting at 67,300 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,853 £.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 218 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers substantially more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 411 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers substantially more torque with 870 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 440 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 6.
The Volvo EX90 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,964 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
545 - 605 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|