VS

GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro vs Mazda 3 Hatchback comparison

Compare performance (177 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro or Mazda 3 Hatchback?

GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro vs Mazda 3 Hatchback: Key differences

GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro

  • somewhat cheaper
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

HAVAL Jolion Pro

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro is somewhat cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 25,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,600 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 3 Hatchback uses 5.6 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

3 Hatchback

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers only slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro delivers slightly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is slightly lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 1,595 kg. The difference is around 178 kg.

Looking at boot space, the GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro offers very slightly more boot space – 381 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries noticeably more – 502 kg compared to 330 kg. That’s a difference of about 172 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
3 Hatchback

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro

The Haval Jolion Pro punches above its class with sharp styling, a surprisingly roomy cabin and a feature set that feels more premium than its price suggests. It’s an easy-to-live-with compact SUV that aims to charm value-conscious buyers who want style and tech without the badge drama — and it might just make your neighbours ask if you traded up.

details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
GWM HAVAL Jolion Pro
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,400 - 23,700 £
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
167 g/km
co2
126 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,595 kg
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
Trunk capacity
381 L
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,898 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
330 kg
Payload
487 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
270 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
GWM
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.