Compare performance (122 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 24,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda Jazz or Mazda 3 Hatchback?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact hatchback segment is crowded with choices, but the Honda Jazz and Mazda 3 Hatchback stand out for their blend of style, performance, and innovation. We delve into these two popular models to uncover what sets them apart in the market.
Starting with the Honda Jazz, which sports a practical, yet modern design. Measuring between 4089mm and 4105mm in length, and standing at 1526mm to 1556mm in height, it offers a compact profile that's well-suited for urban environments. The Jazz's design emphasizes practicality with its 5-door layout and an impressive trunk capacity of 304 liters, despite its smaller footprint.
In contrast, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers a more striking aesthetic characterized by sleek lines and a bold stance. It's longer at 4460mm and wider at 1795mm, combining sporty looks with ample interior space. With a trunk capacity of 351 liters, it offers more cargo space than the Jazz, aligning with its slightly larger build.
Under the hood, the Honda Jazz is equipped with a full hybrid engine producing 122 HP (90 kW) and a smooth Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT). It provides an exemplary blend of power and efficiency, using just between 4.5 to 4.8 liters per 100 km, adjusting easily in varied conditions. The Jazz accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in around 9.4 to 9.7 seconds and reaches a maximum speed of 175 km/h.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback offers a choice between a Petrol MHEV engine with power outputs ranging from 140 to 186 HP (103 to 137 kW), depending on the variant. Equipped with both manual and automatic transmission options, and available as front-wheel or all-wheel drive, it offers a more tailored driving experience. Its acceleration to 100 km/h is accomplished in 8 to 9.8 seconds, and it boasts a top speed of up to 216 km/h. Fuel consumption varies between 5.6 to 6.5 liters per 100 km.
The Honda Jazz delivers innovation with its hybrid powertrain, offering advantages in fuel efficiency and reduced emissions (102-108 g/km CO2). Its clever Magic Seat system offers versatile configurations for enhanced cargo space and utility.
The Mazda 3, on the other hand, brims with technology, featuring an intuitive infotainment system and advanced safety features. Equipped with Mazda's Skyactiv technology in its engines, it improves both performance and fuel efficiency despite its larger engine capacities.
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and Mazda 3 Hatchback depends largely on personal preference and needs. The Jazz excels in fuel efficiency and compact practicality, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers and eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Mazda 3 appeals to those desiring a dynamic and sporty drive, along with advanced features and a strong visual presence.
Ultimately, both hatchbacks offer the versatility and innovation that modern drivers expect, leaving the final decision to the nuances of style, performance, and personal taste.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Honda Jazz is very slightly cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 24,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,448 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda Jazz uses 4.5 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers visibly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.4 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda Jazz delivers marginally more torque with 253 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Honda Jazz is only slightly lighter – 1,302 kg compared to 1,419 kg. The difference is around 117 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers slightly more boot space – 351 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries moderately more – 485 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.
details
The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 26,700 £
|
Price
24,500 - 35,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 108 g/km
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,302 - 1,321 kg
|
Curb weight
1,419 - 1,549 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
304 L
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
-
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
369 - 388 kg
|
Payload
470 - 485 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España