Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Honda Jazz or Mazda 3 Hatchback fits your lifestyle better.
The compact hatchback segment is crowded with choices, but the Honda Jazz and Mazda 3 Hatchback stand out for their blend of style, performance, and innovation. We delve into these two popular models to uncover what sets them apart in the market.
Starting with the Honda Jazz, which sports a practical, yet modern design. Measuring between 4089mm and 4105mm in length, and standing at 1526mm to 1556mm in height, it offers a compact profile that's well-suited for urban environments. The Jazz's design emphasizes practicality with its 5-door layout and an impressive trunk capacity of 304 liters, despite its smaller footprint.
In contrast, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers a more striking aesthetic characterized by sleek lines and a bold stance. It's longer at 4460mm and wider at 1795mm, combining sporty looks with ample interior space. With a trunk capacity of 351 liters, it offers more cargo space than the Jazz, aligning with its slightly larger build.
Under the hood, the Honda Jazz is equipped with a full hybrid engine producing 122 HP (90 kW) and a smooth Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT). It provides an exemplary blend of power and efficiency, using just between 4.5 to 4.8 liters per 100 km, adjusting easily in varied conditions. The Jazz accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in around 9.4 to 9.7 seconds and reaches a maximum speed of 175 km/h.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback offers a choice between a Petrol MHEV engine with power outputs ranging from 140 to 186 HP (103 to 137 kW), depending on the variant. Equipped with both manual and automatic transmission options, and available as front-wheel or all-wheel drive, it offers a more tailored driving experience. Its acceleration to 100 km/h is accomplished in 8 to 9.8 seconds, and it boasts a top speed of up to 216 km/h. Fuel consumption varies between 5.6 to 6.5 liters per 100 km.
The Honda Jazz delivers innovation with its hybrid powertrain, offering advantages in fuel efficiency and reduced emissions (102-108 g/km CO2). Its clever Magic Seat system offers versatile configurations for enhanced cargo space and utility.
The Mazda 3, on the other hand, brims with technology, featuring an intuitive infotainment system and advanced safety features. Equipped with Mazda's Skyactiv technology in its engines, it improves both performance and fuel efficiency despite its larger engine capacities.
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and Mazda 3 Hatchback depends largely on personal preference and needs. The Jazz excels in fuel efficiency and compact practicality, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers and eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Mazda 3 appeals to those desiring a dynamic and sporty drive, along with advanced features and a strong visual presence.
Ultimately, both hatchbacks offer the versatility and innovation that modern drivers expect, leaving the final decision to the nuances of style, performance, and personal taste.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Honda Jazz has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 24500 £. That’s a price difference of around 1448 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda Jazz manages with 4.50 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.60 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback has a distinct edge – offering 186 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.40 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Hatchback performs somewhat better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Honda Jazz tops out at 175 km/h. The difference is around 41 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Honda Jazz pulls minimal stronger with 253 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Honda Jazz is minimal lighter – 1302 kg compared to 1419 kg. The difference is around 117 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers somewhat more room – 351 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Honda Jazz performs to a small extent better – up to 1205 L, which is about 179 L more than the Mazda 3 Hatchback.
When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Hatchback slightly takes the win – 485 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda 3 Hatchback is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.
details
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
The Mazda 3 Hatchback presents a sleek and modern design, capturing attention with its streamlined curves and dynamic stance. Inside, the interior showcases high-quality materials and an intuitive layout, providing comfort and ease for both driver and passengers. On the road, this hatchback impresses with its agile handling and responsive performance, making it a practical yet stylish choice for urban and suburban driving.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 26700 £
|
Price
24500 - 35500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 108 g/km
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1302 - 1320 kg
|
Curb weight
1419 - 1549 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
304 L
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
|
Length
4089 - 4105 mm
|
Length
4460 mm
|
|
Width
-
|
Width
1795 mm
|
|
Height
1526 - 1556 mm
|
Height
1435 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1022 - 1026 L
|
|
Payload
370 - 388 kg
|
Payload
470 - 485 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
Max Speed
199 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The Honda Jazz is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España