In the competitive subcompact segment, the Honda Jazz and Suzuki Swift stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Jazz boasts a versatile interior with its innovative Magic Seats, allowing for exceptional cargo flexibility, while the Swift captivates with its sporty design and nimble handling. Ultimately, choosing between these two popular models comes down to prioritizing space and functionality or a spirited driving experience.
In the bustling world of compact hatchbacks, two notable contenders surface: the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift. Both models promise a blend of practicality, efficiency, and fun behind the wheel, but how do they truly compare? We delve into the technical aspects, innovations, and unique attributes of these vehicles to help you make an informed choice.
The Honda Jazz is powered by a full hybrid engine, showcasing an impressive 122 horsepower generated from a 1498 cm3, 4-cylinder arrangement. With an automatic CVT transmission, the Jazz accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 9.4 to 9.7 seconds across its variants. It exhibits a remarkable torque of 253 Nm, giving it the necessary punch for both city commuting and highway cruising.
On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift boasts a petrol mild-hybrid engine that churns out 82 horsepower from a smaller 1197 cm3, 3-cylinder configuration. Swift's powertrain offers both manual and automatic CVT transmission options, with a slightly more leisurely acceleration of 0 to 100 km/h, ranging from 10.5 to 11 seconds. Its torque is considerably less at 112 Nm, making it less responsive on-demand compared to the Jazz.
One of the standout features of the Honda Jazz is its remarkable fuel efficiency, with figures ranging from 4.5 to 4.8 L/100 km. This is a significant edge, particularly valuable for drivers keen on minimizing fuel expenses. The CO2 emissions for the Jazz hover around 102 to 108 g/km, positioning it favorably in the eco-conscious category.
The Suzuki Swift also presents respectable fuel efficiency, ranging from 4.4 to 4.9 L/100 km. CO2 emissions fall between 98 to 110 g/km, which is commendable but slightly less efficient than the Jazz. Both cars achieve the same CO2 efficiency class, allowing them to attract environmentally aware buyers.
In terms of dimensions, the Honda Jazz measures 4089 mm in length and stands at a height of 1526 mm, providing ample interior space. The versatile trunk offers a capacity of 304 liters, accommodating various luggage requirements. Its curb weight varies from 1302 to 1320 kg, optimal for a compact hatchback.
The Suzuki Swift, while smaller at 3860 mm in length and a maximum height of 1510 mm, remains practical with its 265-liter trunk space. The lightweight design, with curb weights ranging from 1069 to 1145 kg, contributes to its nimble handling but reduces overall cargo capacity compared to the Jazz.
Honda is known for integrating advanced technology, and the Jazz is no exception. It features the latest infotainment systems, offering seamless connectivity, touchscreen interfaces, and safety features designed to keep both drivers and passengers secure. Advanced driver assistance systems are available to enhance the overall driving experience.
The Suzuki Swift, though inherently less tech-laden, still provides essential features like Bluetooth connectivity and smartphone integration. It focuses more on driving enjoyment, with an ergonomic design that makes for a spirited driving experience around city streets and winding roads.
When it comes down to it, the choice between the Honda Jazz and the Suzuki Swift may rely heavily on your personal preferences. If you value hybrid efficiency, practicality, and advanced technology, the Jazz emerges as the natural choice. Conversely, if you seek a lightweight, responsive hatchback that excels in city driving with a punchy design, the Swift has its advantages.
Ultimately, both the Honda Jazz and Suzuki Swift continue to prove why hatchbacks remain a popular choice for urban drivers, each bringing their unique strengths to the market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 23100 - 26100
£
|
Price
about 16200 - 19600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 4.9
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
102 - 108
g/km
|
co2
98 - 110
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
37
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1302 - 1320
kg
|
Curb weight
1069 - 1145
kg
|
Trunk capacity
304
L
|
Trunk capacity
265
L
|
Length
4089 - 4105
mm
|
Length
3860
mm
|
Width
-
|
Width
1735
mm
|
Height
1526 - 1556
mm
|
Height
1485 - 1510
mm
|
Payload
370 - 388
kg
|
Payload
282 - 296
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
122
HP
|
Power HP
82
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Max Speed
175
km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 170
km/h
|
Torque
253
Nm
|
Torque
112
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Power kW
90
kW
|
Power kW
61
kW
|
Engine capacity
1498
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1197
cm3
|
Top speed
175
km/h
|
Top speed
160 - 170
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.