Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
GWM ORA 03 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison
Compare performance (171 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
GWM ORA 03 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ORA 03
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
GWM ORA 03 is clearly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,008 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the GWM ORA 03 is very slightly more efficient: consuming 16.5 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 1.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 180 km more than the GWM ORA 03.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 316 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.2 s. That’s about 4.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 700 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, GWM ORA 03 is noticeably lighter – 1,615 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 546 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more boot space – 519 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 291 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries markedly more – 450 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
GWM ORA 03
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
GWM ORA 03
The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
GWM ORA 03
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.