Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs VW Transporter Bus comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 286 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 41,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or VW Transporter Bus?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs VW Transporter Bus: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW Transporter Bus is moderately cheaper – starting at 41,500 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,950 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is markedly more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 22.4 kWh/100km for the VW Transporter Bus. That’s a difference of about 4.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 276 km more than the VW Transporter Bus.
Transporter Bus
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 286 HP. That’s roughly 201 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the VW Transporter Bus takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 415 Nm. That’s about 535 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: VW Transporter Bus offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, VW Transporter Bus is very slightly lighter – 1,998 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 163 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW Transporter Bus offers noticeably more boot space – 763 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 244 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW Transporter Bus carries significantly more – 1,143 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 693 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VW Transporter Bus
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
VW Transporter Bus
The VW Transporter is the Swiss Army knife of vans — rugged, practical and surprisingly civilized on the road, whether you’re hauling kit for a job or converting it into a weekend camper. It isn’t trying to be glamorous, but its blend of durability, clever packaging and familiar VW charm makes it a sensible choice for buyers who need space without sacrificing driveability.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VW Transporter Bus
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
41,500 - 85,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 9.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.4 - 24.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
87 - 324 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 - 63.8 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 229 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 8
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,998 - 2,620 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 763 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,973 - 5,450 mm
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,941 - 2,032 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,907 - 1,997 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,672 - 4,005 L
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
330 - 1,143 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 286 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 16.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
112 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 415 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 210 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.