Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
GWM ORA 03 vs Renault Twingo comparison
Compare performance (171 HP vs 82 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or Renault Twingo?
GWM ORA 03 vs Renault Twingo: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ORA 03
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Twingo is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,363 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Twingo is clearly more efficient: consuming 13.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the GWM ORA 03. That’s a difference of about 3.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the GWM ORA 03 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 158 km more than the Renault Twingo.
Twingo
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 03 offers clearly more power – delivering 171 HP compared to 82 HP. That’s roughly 89 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM ORA 03 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.2 s, while the Renault Twingo takes 12.1 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 03 delivers clearly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 175 Nm. That’s about 75 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: GWM ORA 03 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Twingo is clearly lighter – 1,275 kg compared to 1,615 kg. The difference is around 340 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Twingo offers visibly more boot space – 305 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.
When it comes to payload, the GWM ORA 03 carries marginally more – 355 kg compared to 320 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The GWM ORA 03 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £33,400
GWM ORA 03
GWM ORA 03
Renault Twingo
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
GWM ORA 03
The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
details
Renault Twingo
The Renault Twingo is a cheeky city car that turns tight streets and impossible parking spaces into an urban playground with its agile handling and compact footprint. It’s perfect for zipping around town thanks to clever interior packaging and a playful character, though buyers chasing long-distance comfort or huge luggage space should consider other options.
details
GWM ORA 03
Renault Twingo
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 42,400 £
|
Price
17,100 - 18,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
260 - 262 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,615 - 1,655 kg
|
Curb weight
1,275 - 1,294 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
Trunk capacity
305 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 - 1,848 mm
|
Width
1,720 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Payload
301 - 320 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
Power HP
82 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
175 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
Power kW
60 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.