VS

Jeep Grand Cherokee vs VW Transporter Transporter comparison

Compare performance (380 HP vs 286 HP), boot space and price (85,600 £ vs 37,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Grand Cherokee or VW Transporter Transporter?

Jeep Grand Cherokee vs VW Transporter Transporter: Key differences

Jeep Grand Cherokee

  • noticeably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h

VW Transporter Transporter

  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Grand Cherokee

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW Transporter Transporter is clearly cheaper – starting at 37,500 £ , while the Jeep Grand Cherokee costs 85,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 48,113 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Grand Cherokee uses 2.9 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the VW Transporter Transporter with 7.1 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the VW Transporter Transporter offers clearly more range – reaching up to 331 km, about 286 km more than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.

Transporter Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers noticeably more power – delivering 380 HP compared to 286 HP. That’s roughly 94 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Grand Cherokee is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the VW Transporter Transporter takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Jeep Grand Cherokee is clearly faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the VW Transporter Transporter tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Grand Cherokee delivers noticeably more torque with 637 Nm compared to 415 Nm. That’s about 222 Nm more.

Grand Cherokee

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW Transporter Transporter is clearly lighter – 1,872 kg compared to 2,434 kg. The difference is around 562 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Transporter Transporter carries significantly more – 1,259 kg compared to 641 kg. That’s a difference of about 618 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Transporter Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,500
Transporter Transporter

VW Transporter Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 110 - 286 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.1 - 8.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.9 - 24.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 56 - 331 km
Jeep Grand Cherokee
VW Transporter Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Jeep Grand Cherokee

The Jeep Grand Cherokee wears its trail-ready roots proudly while wrapping them in a surprisingly civilized and upscale package, so it can tackle rough tracks and the school run with the same swagger. Inside, plush materials and intuitive tech make it a comfortable place to spend time, giving buyers a practical yet characterful SUV that doesn’t take itself too seriously.

details

VW Transporter Transporter

The VW Transporter is the workhorse of the modern tradesman, blending practical cleverness with a cabin that's actually pleasant to spend a long day in. It may not steal the style spotlight, but its unshowy durability, clever load solutions and easy-to-live-with character make it a sensible pick for businesses and weekend projects alike.

details
Jeep Grand Cherokee
VW Transporter Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
85,600 £
Price
37,500 - 60,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.1 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.9 - 24.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
45 km
Electric Range
56 - 331 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
11.8 - 63.8 kWh
co2
65 g/km
co2
0 - 220 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
72 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
2,434 kg
Curb weight
1,872 - 2,462 kg
Trunk capacity
520 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,914 mm
Length
5,050 - 5,450 mm
Width
1,968 mm
Width
2,032 mm
Height
1,858 mm
Height
1,966 - 1,985 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,004 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
641 kg
Payload
755 - 1,259 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
380 HP
Power HP
110 - 286 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 16.9 s
Max Speed
210 km/h
Max Speed
112 - 150 km/h
Torque
637 Nm
Torque
310 - 415 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
280 kW
Power kW
81 - 210 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Jeep
Brand
VW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.