Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia XCeed?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Kia XCeed in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 6.40 L.

What are the Kia XCeed’s length, width and height?

Length 4395 mm, width 1826 mm, height 1483 mm – those are the dimensions of the Kia XCeed.

What drivetrain options does the BYD Atto 2 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the BYD Atto 2?

Depending on the version, the BYD Atto 2 delivers up to 177 HP.

What are the BYD Atto 2’s WLTP consumption values in kWh/100 km?

Average electricity consumption is 16 kWh.

What is the BYD Atto 2’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 312 km.

What maximum speed does the BYD Atto 2 reach?

The BYD Atto 2 reaches up to 160 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the BYD Atto 2?

Length 4310 mm, width 1830 mm, height 1675 mm – those are the dimensions of the BYD Atto 2.

Kia XCeed vs BYD Atto 2 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Kia XCeed has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the BYD Atto 2 costs 27400 £. That’s a price difference of around 4286 £.

Atto 2

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed has a minimal edge – offering 180 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 2 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the BYD Atto 2 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Atto 2 pulls slight stronger with 290 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.

XCeed

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia XCeed is to a small extent lighter – 1351 kg compared to 1570 kg. The difference is around 219 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia XCeed offers minimal more room – 426 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 26 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia XCeed performs minimal better – up to 1378 L, which is about 38 L more than the BYD Atto 2.

When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed slightly takes the win – 479 kg compared to 410 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the BYD Atto 2 shows itself to be edges ahead and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.8 (2 Reviews)

Reviews BYD Atto 2

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

BYD Dolphin

BYD Atto 2

VS

The BYD Dolphin is a zippy, compact EV built for urban life — efficient, easy to park and kind on the wallet, making it a brilliant daily driver for city dwellers. The BYD Atto 2 swaps hatchback frugality for crossover comfort and tech, offering more space, range and kit for buyers who value …

BYD Atto 3

BYD Atto 2

VS

In the battle of BYD's innovative electric vehicles, the Atto 3 emerges as a more advanced contender compared to the Atto 2. With its sleek design, improved range, and enhanced technology features, the Atto 3 not only offers better performance but also caters to the growing demand for eco-friendly …

Costs and Consumption
Price 23100 - 33000 £	Price 27400 - 30000 £
Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km 16 kWh
Electric Range -	Electric Range 312 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 144 - 155 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1351 - 1419 kg	Curb weight 1570 kg
Trunk capacity 426 L	Trunk capacity 400 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 4310 mm
Width 1826 mm	Width 1830 mm
Height 1483 - 1495 mm	Height 1675 mm
Max trunk capacity 1378 L	Max trunk capacity 1340 L
Payload 471 - 479 kg	Payload 410 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 180 HP	Power HP 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 11.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.90 s
Max Speed 182 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 160 km/h
Torque 200 - 265 Nm	Torque 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 85 - 132 kW	Power kW 130 kW
Engine capacity 998 - 1598 cm3	Engine capacity -