VS

Kia XCeed vs MINI Countryman comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 30,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or MINI Countryman?

Kia XCeed vs MINI Countryman: Key differences

Kia XCeed

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • somewhat lighter

MINI Countryman

  • considerably more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Kia XCeed is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the MINI Countryman costs 30,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,951 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MINI Countryman uses 4.6 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

Countryman

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman offers considerably more power – delivering 313 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.5 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Countryman delivers clearly more torque with 494 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 229 Nm more.

XCeed

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia XCeed is somewhat lighter – 1,351 kg compared to 1,570 kg. The difference is around 219 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MINI Countryman offers moderately more boot space – 505 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Countryman carries very slightly more – 500 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Countryman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,100
Countryman

MINI Countryman

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 313 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 463 - 497 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
It's the compact-crossover face-off that asks whether you crave wallet-friendly efficiency or a bit more personality: the Kia Niro goes toe-to-toe with the Kia XCeed. One is all about hybrid thrift and everyday practicality; the other flirts with sharper styling and a livelier drive — both sensible …
Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted …
Kia XCeed
MINI Countryman

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia XCeed

Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.

details
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_25
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_08
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_21
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_57

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Gouala
14 Dec 2025, 00:57:57

Navigation system update for islands like my home, Guadeloupe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gerard
13 Dec 2025, 09:16:07

Quieter at higher speeds on the motorway. Better value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MINI Countryman

The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.

details
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr

Reviews MINI Countryman

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
MINI Countryman
VS
In the rapidly evolving landscape of electric vehicles, the Kia EV3 and MINI Countryman stand out for their distinct charm. The Kia EV3 offers a sleek design with ample range and cutting-edge tech features, making it a top choice for those seeking practicality and innovation. Meanwhile, the MINI …
Hyundai Kona
Kia XCeed
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia XCeed is like picking between a sprightly city fox and a composed urban hatchback with SUV vibes — both promise personality, practicality and sensible running costs without breaking the bank. The Kona delivers cheeky styling and punchy handling for …
Kia Ceed
Kia XCeed
VS
If you want a sharper, more practical hatchback that still feels engaging behind the wheel, the Kia Ceed is the sensible, better-value pick with crisper handling and lower running costs. But if you crave a bit of SUV swagger, higher ride height and extra street presence for town runs and weekend …
Kia XCeed
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Unsure whether the Kia XCeed or the Skoda Kamiq is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Kia XCeed both offer intriguing propositions. The Ford Puma stands out with its engaging driving dynamics and efficient mild-hybrid engine options, making it a joy for those who prioritize sporty performance. On the other hand, the Kia XCeed …
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and …
BMW iX1
MINI Countryman
VS
In a clash of electric versatility, the BMW iX1 and the MINI Countryman present distinctive personas tailored for different drivers. The BMW iX1 impresses with its sophisticated technology and spacious interior, appealing to those seeking luxury and performance in a compact SUV. Meanwhile, the MINI …
Hyundai i30
Kia XCeed
VS
The Hyundai i30 and Kia XCeed offer compelling options for compact car enthusiasts, with each model bringing its distinct strengths to the table. The Hyundai i30 excels with its balanced design and fuel efficiency, appealing to those seeking practicality and reliability in daily driving. Meanwhile, …
Kia XCeed
MINI Countryman

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,100 - 33,000 £
Price
30,100 - 45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
6.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
463 - 497 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
143 - 155 g/km
co2
0 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,419 kg
Curb weight
1,570 - 2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
426 L
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
Length
-
Length
4,444 - 4,447 mm
Width
1,826 mm
Width
1,843 mm
Height
-
Height
1,645 - 1,661 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,450 - 1,530 L
Payload
471 - 485 kg
Payload
460 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
Power HP
122 - 313 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 10.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
208 - 250 km/h
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
230 - 494 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
Power kW
90 - 230 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, G, A
Brand
Kia
Brand
MINI
Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.