VS

Kia XCeed vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or Mitsubishi Colt?

Kia XCeed vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

Kia XCeed

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Colt

  • markedly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Colt is markedly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Kia XCeed costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,972 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed offers clearly more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia XCeed is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.5 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia XCeed delivers visibly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm more.

XCeed

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is moderately lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,351 kg. The difference is around 162 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Kia XCeed offers barely more boot space – 426 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.

When it comes to payload, the Kia XCeed carries markedly more – 485 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Colt is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,200
Colt

Mitsubishi Colt

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Niro
Kia XCeed
VS
It's the compact-crossover face-off that asks whether you crave wallet-friendly efficiency or a bit more personality: the Kia Niro goes toe-to-toe with the Kia XCeed. One is all about hybrid thrift and everyday practicality; the other flirts with sharper styling and a livelier drive — both sensible …
Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted …
Kia XCeed
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia XCeed

Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.

details
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_25
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_08
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_21
Kia_XCeed_MJ23_57

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Gouala
14 Dec 2025, 00:57:57

Navigation system update for islands like my home, Guadeloupe.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gerard
13 Dec 2025, 09:16:07

Quieter at higher speeds on the motorway. Better value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
serpimg_IA2rJY

Reviews Mitsubishi Colt

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Kia XCeed both offer intriguing propositions. The Ford Puma stands out with its engaging driving dynamics and efficient mild-hybrid engine options, making it a joy for those who prioritize sporty performance. On the other hand, the Kia XCeed …
Kia Ceed
Kia XCeed
VS
If you want a sharper, more practical hatchback that still feels engaging behind the wheel, the Kia Ceed is the sensible, better-value pick with crisper handling and lower running costs. But if you crave a bit of SUV swagger, higher ride height and extra street presence for town runs and weekend …
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia XCeed
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia XCeed is like picking between a sprightly city fox and a composed urban hatchback with SUV vibes — both promise personality, practicality and sensible running costs without breaking the bank. The Kona delivers cheeky styling and punchy handling for …
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
Kia XCeed
VS
Unsure whether the Kia Ceed Sportswagon or the Kia XCeed is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Kia Sportage
Kia XCeed
VS
In the competitive showdown between the Kia Sportage and the Kia XCeed, both models deliver distinct driving experiences tailored to different lifestyles. The Kia Sportage stands out with its versatile SUV design, offering greater interior space and robust performance ideal for family adventures. …
Hyundai i30
Kia XCeed
VS
The Hyundai i30 and Kia XCeed offer compelling options for compact car enthusiasts, with each model bringing its distinct strengths to the table. The Hyundai i30 excels with its balanced design and fuel efficiency, appealing to those seeking practicality and reliability in daily driving. Meanwhile, …
Kia XCeed
Renault Captur
VS
The Kia XCeed and Renault Captur compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia XCeed
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,100 - 33,000 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
6.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
143 - 155 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,419 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
426 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,826 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
471 - 485 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Kia
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.