Compare performance (180 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or Mazda CX-30?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the market for compact SUVs heats up, the Kia XCeed and the Mazda CX-30 emerge as two formidable contenders vying for attention in the 2024 model year. Both vehicles offer a unique blend of performance, style, and practicality. In this article, we delve into the technical specifications and innovations that set these two models apart, helping you make an informed choice.
The Kia XCeed and Mazda CX-30 share similar dimensions, each boasting a length of 4395 mm. However, they diverge in width and height. The XCeed stretches across 1826 mm in width and stands 1495 mm tall, while the CX-30 measures a slightly narrower 1795 mm in width with a height of 1540 mm. Inside, both SUVs accommodate five passengers comfortably.
The powertrain options on these two models cater to diverse driving preferences. The Kia XCeed offers a choice between a 100 HP and a 140 HP petrol engine. The manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions route power to the front wheels, delivering acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as swift as 10.2 seconds, with a top speed reaching up to 195 km/h.
In contrast, the CX-30 employs a more robust petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) system with a maximum output of 186 HP. Available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations, the CX-30 achieves 0 to 100 km/h in a brisk 8.3 seconds, hitting a top speed of 204 km/h. This extra power translates to a slightly more exhilarating driving experience.
Fuel efficiency plays a crucial role in the buying decision for many SUV drivers. The Kia XCeed's consumption ranges between 6.3 to 6.5 liters per 100 km depending on the drivetrain, with CO2 emissions around 143-148 g/km. Classified under the CO2 efficiency class E, it represents a moderate impact on the environment.
Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 offers better fuel economy with consumption figures ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 liters per 100 km and CO2 emissions spanning 129-148 g/km, securing a CO2 efficiency class of D to E. This gives the CX-30 a slight edge in terms of environmental friendliness.
Both models prioritize passenger comfort with well-appointed interiors and an array of standard features. The Kia XCeed provides a trunk capacity of 426 liters, slightly undercutting the Mazda CX-30's 430 liters. Drivers will appreciate features like advanced infotainment systems, driver assistance technologies, and flexible seating configurations available in both vehicles.
Choosing between the Kia XCeed and Mazda CX-30 often comes down to personal preference. The XCeed impresses with its dynamic styling, solid performance, and practical features, while the CX-30 offers a spirited drive backed by efficient hybrid technology and enhanced eco-friendly credentials. Ultimately, prospective buyers should consider their desired balance of power, efficiency, and comfort before making a decision.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Kia XCeed is a bit cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers only slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.5 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia XCeed delivers marginally more torque with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia XCeed is marginally lighter – 1,351 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers very slightly more boot space – 430 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries very slightly more – 496 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
The Mazda CX-30 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.
details
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 33,000 £
|
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
143 - 155 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,419 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 426 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,826 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
471 - 485 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España