Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or Mazda CX-30?
As the market for compact SUVs heats up, the Kia XCeed and the Mazda CX-30 emerge as two formidable contenders vying for attention in the 2024 model year. Both vehicles offer a unique blend of performance, style, and practicality. In this article, we delve into the technical specifications and innovations that set these two models apart, helping you make an informed choice.
The Kia XCeed and Mazda CX-30 share similar dimensions, each boasting a length of 4395 mm. However, they diverge in width and height. The XCeed stretches across 1826 mm in width and stands 1495 mm tall, while the CX-30 measures a slightly narrower 1795 mm in width with a height of 1540 mm. Inside, both SUVs accommodate five passengers comfortably.
The powertrain options on these two models cater to diverse driving preferences. The Kia XCeed offers a choice between a 100 HP and a 140 HP petrol engine. The manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions route power to the front wheels, delivering acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as swift as 10.2 seconds, with a top speed reaching up to 195 km/h.
In contrast, the CX-30 employs a more robust petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) system with a maximum output of 186 HP. Available in both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations, the CX-30 achieves 0 to 100 km/h in a brisk 8.3 seconds, hitting a top speed of 204 km/h. This extra power translates to a slightly more exhilarating driving experience.
Fuel efficiency plays a crucial role in the buying decision for many SUV drivers. The Kia XCeed's consumption ranges between 6.3 to 6.5 liters per 100 km depending on the drivetrain, with CO2 emissions around 143-148 g/km. Classified under the CO2 efficiency class E, it represents a moderate impact on the environment.
Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 offers better fuel economy with consumption figures ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 liters per 100 km and CO2 emissions spanning 129-148 g/km, securing a CO2 efficiency class of D to E. This gives the CX-30 a slight edge in terms of environmental friendliness.
Both models prioritize passenger comfort with well-appointed interiors and an array of standard features. The Kia XCeed provides a trunk capacity of 426 liters, slightly undercutting the Mazda CX-30's 430 liters. Drivers will appreciate features like advanced infotainment systems, driver assistance technologies, and flexible seating configurations available in both vehicles.
Choosing between the Kia XCeed and Mazda CX-30 often comes down to personal preference. The XCeed impresses with its dynamic styling, solid performance, and practical features, while the CX-30 offers a spirited drive backed by efficient hybrid technology and enhanced eco-friendly credentials. Ultimately, prospective buyers should consider their desired balance of power, efficiency, and comfort before making a decision.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Kia XCeed has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 2100 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-30 manages with 5.70 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 186 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Kia XCeed performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Kia XCeed pulls barely noticeable stronger with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia XCeed is slight lighter – 1351 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers barely noticeable more room – 430 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 4 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1406 L, which is about 28 L more than the Kia XCeed.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 barely noticeable takes the win – 496 kg compared to 479 kg. That’s a difference of about 17 kg.
The Mazda CX-30 proves to be wins solidly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Kia XCeed offers a stylish and modern design, blending the sportiness of a coupé with the practicality of an SUV. Its interior is well-crafted, featuring high-quality materials and a range of advanced technology to enhance the driving experience. With an emphasis on comfort and efficiency, the XCeed provides a compelling option for those seeking a versatile and dynamic vehicle.
details
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Kia Corporation
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 33000 £
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
144 - 155 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1351 - 1419 kg
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
426 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4395 mm
|
|
Width
1826 mm
|
Width
1795 mm
|
|
Height
1483 - 1495 mm
|
Height
1540 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1378 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
|
|
Payload
471 - 479 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 11.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
182 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Mazda
|
The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España