Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Renault Symbioz?
In the world of compact SUVs, the battle for supremacy has never been more intense. Two contenders have recently attracted immense attention: the Mazda CX-30 and the Renault Symbioz. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, performance, and innovation that makes them top choices for anyone looking for a modern SUV in 2024.
At the heart of the Mazda CX-30 lies a variety of engine options, including a Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) with power outputs of 186 HP and 140 HP. These engines deliver a torque of up to 240 Nm, allowing for acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. The CX-30 offers both manual and automatic transmissions and provides the flexibility of front-wheel or all-wheel drive. This versatility ensures adaptability for various driving conditions.
In contrast, the Renault Symbioz is equipped with a full hybrid engine that produces 143 HP and a torque of 250 Nm. It may not be as powerful as the CX-30, but it compensates with enhanced fuel efficiency. The Symbioz boasts a fuel consumption rate of just 4.8 L/100 km, making it an environmentally friendlier option with a CO2 efficiency class of C. The hybrid system also aids in maintaining a competitive edge, reaching 0 to 100 km/h in 10.6 seconds.
The Mazda CX-30 comes with a modern design reflecting its SUV designation while maintaining a sporty demeanor. It's 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide, and 1540 mm high, providing ample space and comfort with a trunk capacity of 430 liters. The vehicle efficiently balances a curb weight of up to 1587 kg, with advanced safety and infotainment features enhancing the driving experience.
On the other hand, the Renault Symbioz isn't just about efficiency; it's also a showcase of hybrid innovation. With a length of 4413 mm, width of 1797 mm, and height of 1575 mm, it offers more room for luggage with a trunk capacity of 492 liters. The Symbioz demonstrates Renault's commitment to a sustainable future, evident in its optimized hybrid engine and eco-friendly emissions output of 109 g/km CO2.
Mazda takes pride in the CX-30's dynamic yet comfortable ride, ensuring that both short and long journeys are enjoyable. The advanced suspension system and vehicle stability technology provide a safe and smooth experience for its 5 passengers.
The Renault Symbioz, while competitive in terms of comfort, impresses with its futuristic interior and emphasis on eco-friendly driving. The integration of modern technology and user-friendly interfaces makes it a pleasure to drive, providing a serene cabin environment.
In conclusion, while both the Mazda CX-30 and Renault Symbioz offer admirable features, they cater to slightly different priorities. The CX-30 is ideal for those who prioritize a more powerful driving experience with flexible drivetrain options. Meanwhile, the Symbioz stands out as the choice for those seeking efficiency and innovation in hybrid technology. Ultimately, the decision between these two comes down to whether performance or eco-friendliness takes precedence in your SUV selection.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Symbioz has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 806 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Symbioz manages with 4.50 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a somewhat edge – offering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Renault Symbioz takes 9.10 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs somewhat better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Renault Symbioz tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Symbioz pulls barely noticeable stronger with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Symbioz is hardly perceptible lighter – 1359 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Symbioz offers distinct more room – 576 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 146 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Symbioz performs a bit better – up to 1682 L, which is about 276 L more than the Mazda CX-30.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 barely noticeable takes the win – 496 kg compared to 459 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.
The Renault Symbioz proves to be edges ahead and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Renault Symbioz is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Renault Group Media
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
The Renault Symbioz feels less like a traditional car and more like a rolling living room that's been told it's allowed to drive — its flowing lines and minimalist cabin are pure concept-car theatre that teases the future of everyday transport. For buyers with an eye for design and a taste for tech-forward ideas, the Symbioz is an alluring vision of what Renault could offer tomorrow, even if it's not yet a model you can park in your driveway.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
24400 - 30700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
102 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
1359 - 1544 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
492 - 576 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4413 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1540 mm
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1582 - 1682 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
376 - 459 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España