Is the Kia XCeed offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia XCeed is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia XCeed?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Kia XCeed in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 6.40 L.

What are the Kia XCeed’s length, width and height?

Length 4395 mm, width 1826 mm, height 1483 mm – those are the dimensions of the Kia XCeed.

What drivetrain options does the Skoda Fabia have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Skoda Fabia deliver on the road?

The Skoda Fabia reaches a peak output of 177 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the Skoda Fabia use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.90 L.

What maximum speed does the Skoda Fabia reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 228 km/h.

How big is the Skoda Fabia overall?

Length 4108 mm, width 1780 mm, height 1459 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Fabia.

Kia XCeed vs Skoda Fabia - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Fabia has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16900 £, while the Kia XCeed costs 23100 £. That’s a price difference of around 6257 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Fabia manages with 4.90 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.40 L. The difference is about 1.50 L per 100 km.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia XCeed has a minimal edge – offering 180 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 3 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.50 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Fabia performs minimal better – reaching 228 km/h, while the Kia XCeed tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 18 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia XCeed pulls barely noticeable stronger with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.

XCeed

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Fabia is a bit lighter – 1143 kg compared to 1351 kg. The difference is around 208 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia XCeed offers somewhat more room – 426 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 46 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia XCeed performs to a small extent better – up to 1378 L, which is about 188 L more than the Skoda Fabia.

When it comes to payload, Kia XCeed slight takes the win – 479 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Fabia proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Fabia is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Kia XCeed

4.8 (2 Reviews)

Reviews Skoda Fabia

Top Car Comparisons

Skoda Fabia

Skoda Scala

VS

Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …

Skoda Fabia

Skoda Kamiq

VS

If you want a brilliant little hatch that’s cheap to run, slips into tight parking and keeps boot space sensible, the Skoda Fabia is the clever everyday choice; the Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, dresses the same sensible Skoda DNA in a taller, more family-friendly crossover body with extra ride height …

Costs and Consumption
Price 23100 - 33000 £	Price 16900 - 30500 £
Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 144 - 155 g/km	co2 112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 L	Fuel tank capacity 40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1351 - 1419 kg	Curb weight 1143 - 1278 kg
Trunk capacity 426 L	Trunk capacity 380 L
Length 4395 mm	Length 4108 - 4137 mm
Width 1826 mm	Width 1780 mm
Height 1483 - 1495 mm	Height 1458 - 1461 mm
Max trunk capacity 1378 L	Max trunk capacity 1190 L
Payload 471 - 479 kg	Payload 402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 115 - 180 HP	Power HP 80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 11.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed 182 - 210 km/h	Max Speed 175 - 228 km/h
Torque 200 - 265 Nm	Torque 93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 85 - 132 kW	Power kW 59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity 998 - 1598 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3