VS

Lynk & Co 01 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (36,900 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lynk & Co 01 or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Lynk & Co 01 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

01

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Lynk & Co 01 is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,900 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 238,548 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 01 uses 0.9 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 15.1 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers clearly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 320 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Lynk & Co 01 takes 7.7 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers substantially more torque with 900 Nm compared to 535 Nm. That’s about 365 Nm more.

01

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Lynk & Co 01 is noticeably lighter – 1,935 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 725 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers slightly more boot space – 555 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 89 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries significantly more – 840 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 425 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 01 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,900
01

Lynk & Co 01

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 75 km
Lynk & Co 01
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Lynk & Co 01

The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Lynk & Co 01
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
36,900 - 40,300 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
75 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
20 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,935 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
415 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
280 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
535 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
206 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Lynk & Co
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.