Compare performance (180 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 36900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Lynk & Co 01?
The hybrid segment of the SUV market is thriving, with options that blend efficiency, performance, and style. Today, we delve into a comparison between two prominent contenders: the Kia Niro and the Lynk & Co 01. These vehicles offer fascinating contrasts in technology and design, catering to discerning eco-conscious drivers.
The Kia Niro offers a choice between a full hybrid and a plug-in hybrid. The former delivers 129 HP with a consumption of 4.4 L/100km, while the latter pushes the envelope to 171 HP. Thanks to its 1.6-liter engine, the Niro promises acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h within 10.4 to 11.3 seconds, depending on the variant, and a top speed of up to 161 km/h.
In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01, specifically their plug-in hybrid model, boasts significantly higher power outputs of 261 to 276 HP. Its 3- and 4-cylinder engine configurations accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in a brisk 7.7 to 8 seconds. With a top speed up to 210 km/h, the Lynk & Co 01 offers a more performance-oriented drive.
Kia Niro's hybrid prowess is evident in its CO2 figures, which range from 19 to 23 g/km, with a fuel consumption of only 0.8 to 1 L/100km for the plug-in model. It features an electric range of up to 59 km and a battery capacity of 11.1 kWh, making it an economical choice for environmentally conscious drivers.
The Lynk & Co 01 ups the ante with an electric-only range of 75 km, facilitated by a larger 14.1 kWh battery. Its excellent CO2 rating of 20 to 24 g/km, coupled with fuel consumption figures around 0.9 to 1 L/100km, showcases its commitment to reducing carbon footprints.
The Kia Niro sports a compact SUV body with dimensions of 4420 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and a height of 1545 mm. It accommodates up to 5 passengers, providing a trunk capacity of between 348 and 451 liters.
The Lynk & Co 01 stands taller and broader, with dimensions stretching to 4545 mm in length, 1860 mm in width, and 1694 mm in height. It similarly seats 5 occupants while offering a generous trunk capacity of 466 liters.
Kia's approach leans heavily on refined versatility with dual-clutch automatic transmission across all variants, providing a seamless driving experience. The Niro focuses on delivering efficiency and comfort, supported by a payload capacity reaching 466 kg.
Lynk & Co integrates advanced technology aimed at enhancing performance, reflected in its automatic gearbox that provides a sportier engagement with the road. This model is configured with up to 535 Nm torque for responsive acceleration, matched by a payload capacity of 377 to 445 kg.
Choosing between the Kia Niro and the Lynk & Co 01 boils down to personal priorities. If efficiency and a cost-effective eco-footprint are your main concerns, the Niro's blend of hybrid innovation and practicality makes it compelling. However, if a dynamic driving experience with superior performance figures appeals to you, the Lynk & Co 01 emerges as the front-runner.
Ultimately, both the Kia Niro and Lynk & Co 01 offer their unique takes on hybrid innovation, reflecting their manufacturer's distinct ethos and commitment to automotive excellence.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Kia Niro has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £ , while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7718 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lynk & Co 01 manages with 0.90 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Kia Niro with 2.40 L. The difference is about 1.50 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 01 performs somewhat better – achieving up to 75 km, about 13 km more than the Kia Niro.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 has a noticeable edge – offering 280 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 01 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.70 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 01 pulls significantly stronger with 535 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 270 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Niro is noticeable lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1935 kg. The difference is around 461 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Lynk & Co 01 offers barely noticeable more room – 466 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.
When it comes to payload, Kia Niro slightly takes the win – 466 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.
The Lynk & Co 01 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 38600 £
|
Price
36900 - 40300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.90 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
53 - 111 g/km
|
co2
20 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
|
Curb weight
1935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
4420 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1545 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
415 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
280 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.70 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
535 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
206 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España
