@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Kia Corporation

Ford Kuga vs Kia Niro – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Kuga?

Up to 243 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: How much fuel does the Ford Kuga use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 2.80 L.

Q: What is the electric driving range of the Ford Kuga?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 68 km.

Q: How large is the Ford Kuga’s battery?

The Ford Kuga comes with a 14.40 kWh battery.

Q: What maximum speed does the Ford Kuga reach?

The Ford Kuga reaches up to 200 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Kuga’s length, width and height?

Length 4604 mm, width 1882 mm, height 1675 mm – those are the dimensions of the Ford Kuga.

Q: Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Kia Niro?

Up to 180 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What are the consumption figures for the Kia Niro in liters per 100 km?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 2.40 L.

Two cars, one duel: Ford Kuga meets Kia Niro.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

scroll down

Kuga @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Head to Head: Ford Kuga vs. Kia Niro

When it comes to choosing an efficient and versatile family SUV, the competition is fierce. In this article, we delve into a classic comparison between two popular models: the Ford Kuga and the Kia Niro. Both these vehicles offer excellent family-friendly features and modern innovations. Let’s explore how they stack up in terms of performance, economy, and technology.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Engine and Performance

The Ford Kuga offers a variety of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. Its most potent engine delivers an impressive 243 HP, allowing it to sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 7.3 seconds. The Kuga also provides flexibility with its manual and automatic (CVT) transmission choices and comes with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations.

In contrast, the Kia Niro is powered by full and plug-in hybrid engines. The Niro’s flagship plug-in hybrid engine produces up to 171 HP and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in a respectable 10.4 seconds. It employs a dual-clutch automatic transmission that offers smooth shifts and efficient power delivery through its front-wheel-drive system.

scroll down

Kuga @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Fuel efficiency remains a crucial factor when assessing these vehicles. The Ford Kuga’s plug-in hybrid option boasts a remarkable fuel consumption of just 0.9 liters per 100 km and an electric range of up to 69 km. However, the conventional petrol engines can achieve economy figures ranging from 6.4 to 5.3 liters per 100 km, depending on the model.

The Kia Niro also excels in efficiency, with its plug-in hybrid using only 0.8 liters per 100 km and offering an electric range of 59 km. The full hybrid version delivers an economical 4.4 liters per 100 km. In terms of CO2 emissions, the Niro proves to be the greener choice with outputs as low as 19 g/km for the plug-in hybrid, compared to the Kuga's best of 20 g/km.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Interior and Cargo Space

Both models comfortably seat five passengers but their dimensions favor different advantages. The Ford Kuga is slightly larger, providing a generous trunk capacity of 412 liters, making it suitable for families requiring more cargo space. Meanwhile, the Kia Niro offers a 451-liter trunk in its hybrid variant, though the plug-in hybrid’s space is reduced to 348 liters due to the battery placement.

The more compact Niro might be advantageous for urban dwellers looking to navigate tighter spaces, thanks to its overall smaller footprint with a length of 4420 mm compared to the Kuga’s lengths ranging from 4604 mm to 4645 mm.

Kuga @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Conclusion: Which SUV Comes Out on Top?

The choice between the Ford Kuga and the Kia Niro boils down to specific needs and preferences. The Kuga, with its more powerful engine options and optional all-wheel drive, is geared towards those who value performance and versatility. It is also ideal for buyers who frequently engage in long-distance travel, given its superior electric range and larger cargo space.

On the other hand, the Kia Niro stands out for those prioritizing environmental impact and fuel economy, proving to be a keen choice for eco-conscious drivers. Its nimble dimensions make it particularly appealing to urban commuters looking for an efficient, compact SUV.

Both the Ford Kuga and Kia Niro bring a host of modern features and benefits to the table, making them top contenders in the SUV segment. Ultimately, the decision will rest on whether the buyer’s priorities align more with environmentally friendly efficiency or versatile power and space.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Niro has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Ford Kuga costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5108 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.80 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Kuga performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 68 km, about 6 km more than the Kia Niro.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a distinct edge – offering 243 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs slight better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Kia Niro tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Kia Niro pulls minimal stronger with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Niro is minimal lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1526 kg. The difference is around 52 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Kia Niro offers barely noticeable more room – 451 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 39 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs barely noticeable better – up to 1534 L, which is about 89 L more than the Kia Niro.

When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga to a small extent takes the win – 550 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Ford Kuga shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £34,200

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Kuga

Price : 34200 - 46300 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail : Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 150 - 243 HP
Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 6.8 L
Electric Range : 68 km
Battery Capacity : 1.1 - 14.4 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 7.3 - 9.9 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 195 - 200 km/h
Torque : 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3 - 4
Doors : 5
Model : Kuga
Modell : Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga 2.5 FHEV, Kuga 2.5 PHEV, Kuga Active X 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga Active X 2.5 FHEV, Kuga Active X 2.5 PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class : E, D, B
Trim Level : Titanium, ST-Line, ST-Line X, Sound Edition, Titanium CVT, Titanium Allrad CVT, ST-Line CVT, ST-Line Allrad CVT, ST-Line X CVT, ST-Line X Allrad CVT, Sound Edition CVT, Sound Edition Allrad CVT, Titanium Automatik, ST-Line Automatik, ST-Line X Automatik, Sound Edition Automatik, CVT, Allrad CVT, Automatik
Power kW : 111 - 178 kW
co2 : 55 - 154 g/km
Engine capacity : 1496 - 2488 cm3
Curb weight : 1526 - 1859 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 42 - 54 L
Trunk capacity : 412 L
Length : 4604 - 4645 mm
Width : 1882 mm
Height : 1673 - 1681 mm
Brand : Ford
Max trunk capacity : 1534 L
Payload : 541 - 550 kg

details

Ford Kuga

3.5 (2)

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details

ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Kia Niro

5 (1)

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details

@ Kia Corporation

@ Kia Corporation

@ Kia Corporation

@ Kia Corporation

@ Kia Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Kuga

@ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC40

The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Focus

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Kuga

The Ford Focus is the sharp, pocket-sized hatchback that rewards anyone who enjoys direct steering, low running costs and a sporty feel on twisty roads, while the Ford Kuga trades that agility for a higher driving position, roomier cabin and SUV practicality that suits families and weekend …

Ford Kuga

Kia Niro

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center	@ Kia Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price 34200 - 46300 £	Price 29100 - 38600 £
Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km 2.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 68 km	Electric Range 57 - 62 km
Battery Capacity 1.1 - 14.4 kWh	Battery Capacity 1.3 - 11.1 kWh
co2 55 - 154 g/km	co2 53 - 111 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 - 54 L	Fuel tank capacity 37 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1526 - 1859 kg	Curb weight 1474 - 1594 kg
Trunk capacity 412 L	Trunk capacity 348 - 451 L
Length 4604 - 4645 mm	Length 4420 mm
Width 1882 mm	Width 1825 mm
Height 1673 - 1681 mm	Height 1545 mm
Max trunk capacity 1534 L	Max trunk capacity 1342 - 1445 L
Payload 541 - 550 kg	Payload 466 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 243 HP	Power HP 138 - 180 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.3 - 9.9 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 9.9 - 11.4 s
Max Speed 195 - 200 km/h	Max Speed 170 - 185 km/h
Torque 240 Nm	Torque 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 111 - 178 kW	Power kW 102 - 132 kW
Engine capacity 1496 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 1580 cm3