What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?

The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Kuga?

Up to 243 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Ford Kuga use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 2.80 L.

What is the electric driving range of the Ford Kuga?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 68 km.

How large is the Ford Kuga’s battery?

The Ford Kuga comes with a 14.40 kWh battery.

What maximum speed does the Ford Kuga reach?

The Ford Kuga reaches up to 200 km/h.

What are the Ford Kuga’s length, width and height?

Length 4604 mm, width 1882 mm, height 1675 mm – those are the dimensions of the Ford Kuga.

Is the VW T-Roc offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the VW T-Roc's engine?

The VW T-Roc reaches a peak output of 150 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the VW T-Roc according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 5.50 L.

How fast can the VW T-Roc go?

The VW T-Roc reaches up to 212 km/h.

What is the VW T-Roc’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 475 L fit inside.

How big is the VW T-Roc overall?

The VW T-Roc measures 4373 mm long, 1811 mm wide and 1573 mm high.

Ford Kuga vs VW T-Roc - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW T-Roc has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7804 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Kuga manages with 2.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 2.70 L per 100 km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a distinct edge – offering 243 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 93 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs slight better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Ford Kuga tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Roc pulls barely noticeable stronger with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Roc is hardly perceptible lighter – 1465 kg compared to 1526 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers a bit more room – 475 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 63 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs to a small extent better – up to 1534 L, which is about 184 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga slight takes the win – 550 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.1 (4 Reviews)

Reviews VW T-Roc

5 (3 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai

VW T-Roc

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …

Skoda Kamiq

VW T-Roc

VS

Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …

Costs and Consumption
Price 34200 - 46300 £	Price 26400 - 38600 £
Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 68 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 1.1 - 14.4 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 55 - 154 g/km	co2 126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 - 54 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 4 - 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1526 - 1859 kg	Curb weight 1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity 412 L	Trunk capacity 284 - 475 L
Length 4604 - 4645 mm	Length 4373 mm
Width 1882 mm	Width 1811 - 1828 mm
Height 1673 - 1681 mm	Height 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity 1534 L	Max trunk capacity 1350 L
Payload 541 - 550 kg	Payload 368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 243 HP	Power HP 115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.3 - 9.9 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed 195 - 200 km/h	Max Speed 196 - 212 km/h
Torque 240 Nm	Torque 200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 111 - 178 kW	Power kW 85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1496 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3