VS

Lynk & Co 02 vs Rolls-Royce Phantom comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 571 HP), boot space and price (30,900 £ vs 445,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lynk & Co 02 or Rolls-Royce Phantom?

Lynk & Co 02 vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: Key differences

Lynk & Co 02

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Phantom

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

02

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Lynk & Co 02 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,900 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Phantom costs 445,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 414,862 £.

Phantom

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers clearly more power – delivering 571 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 299 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Phantom is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Lynk & Co 02 takes 5.5 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Phantom delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 323 Nm. That’s about 577 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Lynk & Co 02 is clearly lighter – 1,895 kg compared to 2,560 kg. The difference is around 665 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers noticeably more boot space – 548 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 138 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Phantom carries a bit more – 440 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,900
02

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 435 - 445 km
details

Frequently compared as well

ZEEKR X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
We’re squaring off the ZEEKR X against the Lynk & Co 02 to find which compact crossover delivers the best blend of design, tech and real-world usability. Expect sparks in the handling department from the ZEEKR and everyday cleverness from the 02 — the question is which one fits your driveway and …
Lynk & Co 02
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lynk & Co 02 and the Toyota C‑HR go head-to-head as compact crossovers that blend urban-friendly dimensions with bold styling. I'll compare the 02 and the Toyota C‑HR across design, driving feel, practicality and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.
Lynk & Co 02
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details
serpimg_8xULuL

Reviews Lynk & Co 02

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
LUIS
7 Jul 2026, 10:24:27

It's a very well-finished and aesthetically attractive car, very high-performing, but one in which the suspension doesn't match the performance delivered by its engine. In the Core version it has fairly restrained fuel consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Rolls-Royce Phantom

The Phantom stands as the epitome of luxury and craftsmanship, effortlessly merging opulence with unparalleled performance. With its iconic design and attention to detail, this flagship sedan commands respect on the road while cocooning its passengers in sumptuous comfort. Every journey in the Phantom is an experience, where timeless elegance meets cutting-edge technology.

details
serpimg_Nvbd2M

Reviews Rolls-Royce Phantom

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Rolls-Royce Phantom
VS
The Rolls-Royce Cullinan and the Rolls-Royce Phantom are two expressions of ultimate luxury: the Cullinan delivers SUV practicality and a commanding presence with genuine off‑road ability, while the Phantom is the definitive full‑size saloon built around serene, chauffeur‑focused comfort and …
Mercedes S-Class
Rolls-Royce Phantom
VS
The Mercedes S-Class and Rolls-Royce Phantom compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 02
VS
The Lynk & Co 01 and Lynk & Co 02 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Skoda Octavia Limousine
Rolls-Royce Phantom
VS
Skoda Octavia Limousine and Rolls-Royce Phantom go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
XPeng G6
Lynk & Co 02
VS
In the competitive landscape of electric vehicles, the XPeng G6 and Lynk & Co 02 each offer unique strengths that cater to different consumer preferences. The XPeng G6 impresses with its sleek design and advanced tech features, positioning itself as a strong contender for tech-savvy buyers. …
Bentley Continental Coupe
Rolls-Royce Phantom
VS
The Bentley Continental Coupe and Rolls-Royce Phantom compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Lynk & Co 02
Leapmotor B05
VS
Unsure whether the Lynk & Co 02 or the Leapmotor B05 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
MG MG4
Lynk & Co 02
VS
MG MG4 and Lynk & Co 02 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lynk & Co 02
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
Price
445,700 - 514,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
15.5 - 15.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
351 - 361 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,895 kg
Curb weight
2,560 - 2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
548 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,845 mm
Width
2,018 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 kg
Payload
390 - 440 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 HP
Power HP
571 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
323 Nm
Torque
900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
200 kW
Power kW
420 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2022
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Lynk & Co
Brand
Rolls-Royce
What drive types are available for the Lynk & Co 02?

The Lynk & Co 02 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.