VS

Lynk & Co 02 vs VW Golf comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 325 HP), boot space and price (30,900 £ vs 28,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lynk & Co 02 or VW Golf?

Lynk & Co 02 vs VW Golf: Key differences

Lynk & Co 02

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more electric range
  • barely more trunk space
details

VW Golf

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

02

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW Golf is very slightly cheaper – starting at 28,300 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,571 £.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 445 km, about 302 km more than the VW Golf.

Golf

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Golf offers moderately more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Golf is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Lynk & Co 02 takes 5.5 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Golf delivers noticeably more torque with 420 Nm compared to 323 Nm. That’s about 97 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW Golf is considerably lighter – 1,307 kg compared to 1,895 kg. The difference is around 588 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lynk & Co 02 offers barely more boot space – 410 L compared to 381 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Golf carries visibly more – 508 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 133 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 02 holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,900
02

Lynk & Co 02

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 435 - 445 km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
VW Golf
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Golf remains the benchmark compact hatchback with precise handling, sensible packaging and a grown-up interior that rewards drivers who value refinement and everyday usability; the Taigo, by contrast, trades some practicality for SUV looks and a higher ride, offering bolder styling, slightly …
Lynk & Co 02
VW Golf

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.

details
serpimg_8xULuL

Reviews Lynk & Co 02

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
LUIS
7 Jul 2026, 10:24:27

It's a very well-finished and aesthetically attractive car, very high-performing, but one in which the suspension doesn't match the performance delivered by its engine. In the Core version it has fairly restrained fuel consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Golf

The Golf is a quietly accomplished compact that blends practicality, refinement and approachable driving manners into a very usable everyday package. It’s well built, comfortable and versatile, making it a smart choice whether you want sensible family transport or an enjoyable commuter.

details
DB2019AU02117_medium
DB2019AU02116_medium
DB2019AU02120_medium
DB2019AU02082_medium
DB2019AU02081_medium
DB2019AU02087_medium
DB2019AU02105_medium

Reviews VW Golf

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

ZEEKR X
Lynk & Co 02
VS
We’re squaring off the ZEEKR X against the Lynk & Co 02 to find which compact crossover delivers the best blend of design, tech and real-world usability. Expect sparks in the handling department from the ZEEKR and everyday cleverness from the 02 — the question is which one fits your driveway and …
Audi Q2
VW Golf
VS
The Audi Q2 trades the Golf’s down-to-earth practicality for a dash of city-cool style and a slightly raised driving position, so you’ll arrive looking sharper — but with a bit less rear-seat space and often a higher price. For buyers who value sensible packaging, ride comfort and everyday …
VW Golf
VW T-Cross
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Cross comes down to whether you want a traditional hatchback with sharper driving dynamics or a compact crossover that prioritizes space, practicality and a higher seating position. The Golf rewards with more engaging handling and a refined interior, while …
CUPRA Leon
VW Golf
VS
The CUPRA Leon and the Golf are closely related compact hatchbacks: the CUPRA packs sharper handling, stronger engines and a sportier image, while the Golf prioritizes refinement, everyday comfort and broad usability. This comparison cuts through specs, driving feel, interior quality and running …
VW Golf
VW ID.3
VS
The Golf and the ID.3 are Volkswagen’s two compact hatchbacks: the Golf sticks to the familiar internal-combustion/hybrid formula while the ID.3 is a fully electric newcomer. This comparison focuses on driving experience, running costs, practicality and technology to help you choose which suits …
Skoda Scala
VW Golf
VS
In one corner the Skoda Scala — clever, spacious and gloriously sensible; in the other the VW Golf — the benchmark hatchback that smooths out imperfections and keeps resale values healthy. Which one deserves your driveway: the Scala’s no-nonsense practicality and lower price, or the Golf’s polish, …
VW Golf
VW Passat
VS
Choosing between the Volkswagen Golf and the Volkswagen Passat comes down to whether you prioritize compact agility or passenger and luggage space. The Golf is a nimble, city-friendly hatchback with engaging handling and easy parking, while the Passat delivers a more spacious cabin, smoother ride …
Skoda Kamiq
VW Golf
VS
Skoda Kamiq and VW Golf go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Kamiq or the VW Golf is …
Lynk & Co 02
VW Golf

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
Price
28,300 - 46,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
Electric Range
131 - 143 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
25 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,895 kg
Curb weight
1,307 - 1,662 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
273 - 381 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,845 mm
Width
1,789 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 kg
Payload
438 - 508 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 HP
Power HP
116 - 325 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 10.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
323 Nm
Torque
220 - 420 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
200 kW
Power kW
85 - 239 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, F, B
Brand
Lynk & Co
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Lynk & Co 02?

The Lynk & Co 02 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.