VS

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Mitsubishi Colt comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 18,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Mitsubishi Colt?

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Mitsubishi Colt: Key differences

Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mitsubishi Colt

  • visibly cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • a bit lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Hatchback

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi Colt is visibly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 25,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,858 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

Colt

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers markedly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda 3 Hatchback delivers visibly more torque with 240 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

3 Hatchback

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is a bit lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,417 kg. The difference is around 228 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Colt offers slightly more boot space – 391 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries visibly more – 502 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 117 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
3 Hatchback

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Mitsubishi Colt

Costs and Consumption

Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 146 g/km
co2
96 - 119 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
-
Length
4,053 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
1,439 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Payload
487 - 502 kg
Payload
381 - 385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.