Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Colt vs Renault Clio - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (143 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (18200 £ vs 16600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Renault Clio?
Clio
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Clio has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16600 £ , while the Mitsubishi Colt costs 18200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1577 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.10 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mitsubishi Colt with 4.20 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Clio
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio has a barely noticeable edge – offering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.30 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Clio performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Colt tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Clio pulls noticeable stronger with 205 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Clio
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Clio is barely noticeable lighter – 1124 kg compared to 1189 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.
Boot capacity is identical – both offer 391 L of storage.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio performs barely noticeable better – up to 1176 L, which is about 107 L more than the Mitsubishi Colt.
When it comes to payload, Renault Clio to a small extent takes the win – 463 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Clio is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Clio
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £16,600
Renault Clio
Mitsubishi Colt
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
detailsRenault Clio
The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
details
Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Clio
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18200 - 25000 £
|
Price
16600 - 23700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
co2
92 - 121 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1189 - 1380 kg
|
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
4053 mm
|
Length
4053 - 4116 mm
|
|
Width
1798 mm
|
Width
1768 - 1798 mm
|
|
Height
1439 mm
|
Height
1440 - 1451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1176 L
|
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Payload
398 - 463 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
67 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 17.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
49 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Mitsubishi Colt offered with different drivetrains?
The Mitsubishi Colt is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.