VS

Kia Picanto vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (68 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (15,100 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Picanto or Renault Clio?

Kia Picanto vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Kia Picanto

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Picanto

Clash of the City Compacts: Kia Picanto vs Renault Clio

In the bustling world of city cars, the competition is fierce, and the choices are plenty. Two contenders stand out with remarkable features and innovations: the Kia Picanto and the Renault Clio. Designed for urban dwellers and compact car enthusiasts, both vehicles promise comfort, efficiency, and a touch of style. Let's delve deeper into the technical aspects and innovations of these two hatchbacks.

Clio

Under the Hood: Engine and Performance

The Kia Picanto 2024 model offers a choice of petrol engines with outputs varying from 63 to 79 HP. Its engine comes with options of both manual and automated manual transmissions, ensuring smooth rides tailored to your preference. Despite its compact size, the Picanto manages to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 13.1 seconds for its quickest version and can reach a top speed of 159 km/h. The consumption ranges from 5.2 to 5.7 L/100km, reflecting its nimble character.

In contrast, the Renault Clio spans a more diverse engine range, including Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG options, with power outputs from 67 to 143 HP. The Clio can accelerate as fast as 9.3 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h in its hybrid variant, reaching top speeds of 174 km/h. This ensures a dynamic drive whether navigating city streets or highways. Fuel efficiency varies from 4.3 to 7 L/100km, with the hybrid setup providing notable savings.

Picanto

Dimensions and Practicality

The Kia Picanto, with a length of 3605 mm and a width of 1595 mm, is designed for maneuverability in tight city environments. It offers seating for up to 5 passengers and a trunk capacity of 255 liters, a suitable size for daily commuting and small family outings.

The Renault Clio, larger with a length of 4053 mm and a width of 1798 mm, comfortably seats five passengers. It boasts a more generous trunk space with up to 391 liters available, ideal for those who require extra cargo capacity for their urban adventures.

Clio

Innovations and Efficiency

Both models prioritize fuel efficiency and low emissions, aligning with modern environmental standards. The Picanto's CO2 emissions range from 118 to 130 g/km, while the Clio's more varied engine lineup results in emissions between 97 and 130 g/km, with the hybrid variant highlighting Renault's commitment to eco-friendliness.

Innovative features in both vehicles include advanced safety systems and connectivity options, ensuring a modern driving experience that caters to tech-savvy users. The Clio, with its hybrid technology, offers an enticing option for those conscious of their carbon footprint.

Picanto

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Kia Picanto and the Renault Clio largely depends on your priorities. If you value compact agility and straightforward efficiency, the Picanto stands out as an excellent choice. However, if comprehensive engine options, including hybrids and greater cargo space, appeal more to your lifestyle, the Clio makes a compelling case.

Both vehicles excel in their categories, continually innovating to meet the needs of urban drivers. As they vie for the attention of city-dwellers, these two hatchbacks showcase the blend of practicality and innovation that defines the modern compact car.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Comparing the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza means choosing between two of Europe's most capable superminis: the Clio leans stylish and comfortable, while the Ibiza focuses on sharp handling and value. This quick head-to-head will highlight differences in driving feel, space, efficiency and …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Picanto

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Kia Picanto is slightly cheaper – starting at 15,100 £ , while the Renault Clio costs 17,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,980 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Kia Picanto with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers clearly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 68 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Kia Picanto takes 14.6 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Clio delivers considerably more torque with 190 Nm compared to 96 Nm. That’s about 94 Nm more.

Picanto

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Picanto is barely lighter – 1,124 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 78 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers noticeably more boot space – 327 L compared to 255 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries markedly more – 463 kg compared to 332 kg. That’s a difference of about 131 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
details
Kia Picanto
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Picanto

Kia Picanto is a cheeky city hatch that squeezes surprising style, practicality and a smile-inducing drive into a pocket-friendly package. It’s ideal for urban buyers who want fuss-free running, effortless parking and a car that punches above its class without pretending to be anything it’s not.

details
Kia_Picanto_GT_Line_MJ21_01
Kia_Picanto_GT_Line_MJ21_03
Kia Picanto X-Line_02
Kia_Picanto_MJ22_Innen_01

Reviews Kia Picanto

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Dacia Sandero
Kia Picanto
VS
Comparing the Dacia Sandero and the Kia Picanto: both are budget-friendly small cars but they appeal to different priorities — the Sandero emphasizes space and low running costs, while the Picanto focuses on compact agility and city-friendly maneuverability. If you need roomy practicality and …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Clio and Yaris are two of Europe’s most popular superminis, each offering smart urban agility and efficient engines. Choosing between the Clio and Yaris comes down to whether you want the Clio’s stylish cabin and sharper handling or the Yaris’s proven reliability and hybrid efficiency.
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
The Ford Puma and Renault Clio are two popular compact choices that blend city-friendly dimensions with striking style, yet they adopt different priorities in driving character and practicality. The Puma leans toward a higher-riding, crossover feel with clever boot and storage solutions, while the …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Kia Picanto
Suzuki Swift
VS
The Kia Picanto and Suzuki Swift are two popular small hatchbacks that balance low running costs with practical, city-friendly dimensions. This comparison focuses on real-world usability, ownership costs and driving experience to help you pick the right one.
Renault Clio
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Clio stands as a stalwart city car known for its efficiency, compact design, and affordability, making it a favorite for urban commuters. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz concept car offers a glimpse into the future of driving with its bold emphasis on autonomous technology, …
Kia Picanto
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,100 - 19,500 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 134 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,124 - 1,131 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
255 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,595 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
253 - 332 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
68 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.6 - 17.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
96 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
50 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Kia
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Kia Picanto have?

The Kia Picanto is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.