In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Hyundai i10 stands out with its impressive maneuverability and surprising interior space, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio captivates with its stylish design and advanced technology features, offering a more premium feel for those seeking a blend of comfort and agility. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, showcasing the diverse appeal within the subcompact segment.
In the increasingly competitive hatchback market, the Hyundai i10 and Renault Clio stand out as notable options for urban drivers seeking style, efficiency, and performance. While both cars embody the virtues of modern city mobility, they diverge in various aspects such as technical specifications, design innovations, and overall driving experience. This comparison sheds light on how these two vehicles stack up against each other.
The Hyundai i10 is available with a range of petrol engines, offering power outputs of 63 to 90 HP from its 1.0L and 1.2L engine options. It promises an effortless driving experience, especially in city environments, with a curb weight varying from 996 to 1,010 kg. The i10 achieves an impressive acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 11.4 seconds, thanks to its efficient design and lightweight construction.
In contrast, the Renault Clio offers a broader range of engine choices, including full hybrid, petrol, and LPG options, with power outputs ranging from 67 HP to a robust 143 HP from its 1.0L and 1.6L engines. The Clio's hybrid variant excels in fuel efficiency, achieving a remarkable average consumption of just 4.3 L/100 km. The Clio can sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 9.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty character and agile performance.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Hyundai i10 provides respectable consumption figures, with averages between 4.9 to 5.4 L/100 km across its various engine configurations. CO2 emissions range from 111 g/km to 123 g/km, placing the i10 in a competitive position regarding environmental impact.
On the other hand, the Renault Clio sets the bar higher in terms of eco-friendliness, especially with its hybrid variant. The Clio boasts an impressive CO2 emission range of just 97 g/km to 130 g/km and an overall fuel economy that often surpasses the i10's figures. This positions the Clio as a more sustainable choice for environmentally-conscious consumers.
Inside, the Hyundai i10 aims for a balance of functionality and comfort. It offers ample space for four to five passengers, with a trunk capacity of 252 liters. The design emphasizes user-friendly technology and practicality, featuring a well-equipped dashboard and modern infotainment options.
The Renault Clio steps up the game with an upscale interior and advanced technology. Providing seating for five, it boasts a larger trunk capacity of 301 to 391 liters, depending on the configuration. The Clio’s cabin includes premium materials and an intuitive layout, making it a favorite among those who value a more refined driving experience.
In terms of driving dynamics, the Hyundai i10 provides a nimble and responsive ride, ideal for city navigation. Its compact dimensions allow for easy maneuvering in tight spaces, while the front-wheel-drive layout enhances stability and control.
Conversely, the Renault Clio adopts a sportier stance with a more dynamic driving experience. The suspension system and steering feedback cater to drivers seeking a lively response and confidence on the road. The Clio's top speed of 174 km/h adds to its credentials as a performance-focused hatchback, providing a thrilling experience that rivals many competitors.
Choosing between the Hyundai i10 and Renault Clio ultimately hinges on personal preferences and priorities. The i10 offers practicality, efficiency, and a user-friendly approach, making it an excellent choice for buyers focused on urban commuting. On the other hand, the Clio impresses with its advanced engines, higher fuel efficiency, and superior interior quality, appealing to those who prioritize performance and technology.
Both cars have unique strengths, and potential buyers should carefully consider their individual needs when making a decision. Whichever you choose, both the Hyundai i10 and Renault Clio promise to deliver fulfilling driving experiences in their respective segments.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 14600 - 19000
£
|
Price
about 15800 - 23000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
111 - 123
g/km
|
co2
97 - 130
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
36
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 42
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
996 - 1099
kg
|
Curb weight
1124 - 1331
kg
|
Trunk capacity
252
L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391
L
|
Length
3670 - 3675
mm
|
Length
4053
mm
|
Width
1680
mm
|
Width
1798
mm
|
Height
1480 - 1483
mm
|
Height
1440
mm
|
Payload
344 - 423
kg
|
Payload
365 - 406
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, LPG
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
63 - 90
HP
|
Power HP
67 - 143
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 18.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 17.1
s
|
Max Speed
143 - 175
km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 174
km/h
|
Torque
93 - 172
Nm
|
Torque
95 - 205
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
46 - 66
kW
|
Power kW
49 - 105
kW
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1197
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598
cm3
|
Top speed
143 - 175
km/h
|
Top speed
160 - 174
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.