VS

Ford Puma vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Clio?

Ford Puma vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Ford Puma VS Renault Clio — quick verdict for shoppers

Ford Puma VS Renault Clio pits a playful small‑SUV against a composed, efficiency‑first hatchback, and the choice comes down to what you value more in daily life. The Ford Puma leans into driving enjoyment and a genuinely clever boot layout that suits active lifestyles, while the Renault Clio prioritises low running costs and a calm, grown‑up cabin experience. For buyers who want a car that feels alive in corners and hauls odd items easily, the Puma’s character is persuasive. For those whose priority is a quiet, efficient commute with modern Google‑based infotainment and strong package value, the Clio is the safer pick. This page outlines how those tendencies translate to real use rather than spec sheets.

Clio

Character and driving: playful crossover vs measured hatch

The Ford Puma feels like a small SUV that inherited Fiesta-like agility — it steers crisply and rewards a spirited driving style, whereas the Renault Clio steers a little more reserved and emphasises stability and refinement. That sportier edge in the Puma brings tangible enjoyment around town and on sweeping B‑roads, but it also exposes a firmer suspension and some three‑cylinder rasp at low revs that not every buyer will like. The Clio’s powertrain and calibration are tuned to be smooth and efficient, which makes overtaking and motorway cruising feel relaxed but less urgent than in the Puma. If you value communicative chassis responses and a fun demeanour, the Puma stands out; if you prefer a composed, less demanding drive that keeps consumption down, the Clio is the better temperament match. Each car’s character defines the trade‑offs: liveliness versus composure, engagement versus efficiency.

Puma

Comfort and long‑distance behavior: who soaks up miles better?

On long runs the Renault Clio presents a more traditional ‘grown‑up’ long‑distance package, with calmer noise levels and a supple ride that makes motorway miles less fatiguing for passengers. The Ford Puma’s front seats are supportive and the car remains steady on highways, though its firmer suspension and occasional drivetrain quirks can make long stints feel more involving than effortlessly relaxed. Rear passengers will notice a difference: the Puma’s backseat is tighter and best for shorter stretches, while the Clio’s rear is still compact but generally more tolerable for adults on longer journeys. Noise comfort favours the Clio in steady cruising, while the Puma rewards drivers who enjoy a tauter chassis and direct input. Decide whether you want effortless isolation on long trips (Clio) or an engaging yet sometimes firmer experience (Puma).

Clio

Practicality and everyday usability: boots, seats and family chores

The Ford Puma wins headline practicality with its inventive boot layout — a low, washable storage cubby and flexible floor make loading awkward items or muddy kit noticeably easier than in a typical hatch. The Renault Clio, especially with its conventional petrol boot, offers very competitive luggage space in the class and the option of three ISOFIX mounting points makes it attractive to parents juggling child seats. The trade‑off is that Clio’s boot can have a higher lip and a less flat loading area on folding the seats, while the Puma’s clever underfloor box often tips the balance for active households. Both cars keep rear space tight for tall adults, but the Clio’s layout and family‑friendly anchor points make it the more straightforward choice for child‑centred buyers. Think about what you carry most: bulky, dirty gear points to Puma; regular family luggage and easy child seat installs point to Clio.

Puma

Cabin feel and tech: screens, controls and perceived quality

Renault Clio’s cabin presents a calm, modern interface with a very usable Google‑based system and the reassurance of physical climate controls, which makes everyday tasks quicker and less distracting. The Ford Puma pushes a larger, sleeker screen package and up‑to‑date SYNC software that looks impressive, but fewer physical buttons mean reaching for the screen for basic adjustments — a point some drivers find less intuitive on the move. Material quality is mixed in both cars depending on trim: the Clio can feel more consistently mature in mid to high trims, while the Puma’s design and tech feel younger and more gadget‑led. Ergonomically, the Clio leans toward convenience and low effort, whereas the Puma leans toward a sporty, driver‑centric layout that occasionally sacrifices tactile simplicity. Buyers who want fast, fuss‑free tech operation will prefer the Clio; those who prioritise slick screens and a driver‑focused dash will enjoy the Puma.

Clio

Buyer fit: who should seriously consider each car?

Choose the Ford Puma if you want a compact SUV that’s engaging to drive, offers genuinely clever loadspace for active weekends, and you’re happy to trade a snug rear bench and a firmer ride for that personality. Opt for the Renault Clio if you prioritise low running costs, a quieter, more composed cabin on the motorway, and straightforward, family‑friendly practicality with solid value for money. The Puma suits singles, couples and tech‑savvy buyers who value handling and utility; the Clio fits commuters and small families who want economy, comfort and easy day‑to‑day usability. Read on to the technical comparison to see how those real‑world differences map onto powertrains, consumption and equipment so you can match the numbers to the lifestyle trade‑offs described here.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Clio is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,857 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers noticeably more torque with 290 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is only slightly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 114 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Comparing the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza means choosing between two of Europe's most capable superminis: the Clio leans stylish and comfortable, while the Ibiza focuses on sharp handling and value. This quick head-to-head will highlight differences in driving feel, space, efficiency and …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.