In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who crave a more dynamic experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek aesthetics and practicality, offering a more refined ride and advanced tech features for everyday driving. Ultimately, buyers seeking a blend of style and versatility will need to consider their priorities, as both models excel in different areas.
In the dynamic world of compact cars, two names often stand out for differing reasons: the Ford Puma and the Renault Clio. As consumers seek stylish yet functional vehicles, both models offer a unique blend of technical prowess and innovative features. In this article, we’ll explore the technical specifications, innovations, and overall performance of these two popular models.
The Ford Puma presents itself as a compact SUV, offering a higher ride height and a commanding view of the road. With a length of approximately 4186 to 4226 mm, a width of 1805 mm, and a height of 1550 mm, it comfortably accommodates five passengers and boasts significant trunk capacity of 456 liters. This SUV appeal, combined with sporty aesthetics, makes the Puma stand out in urban environments.
On the other hand, the Renault Clio remains faithful to the hatchback format. Its compact size (4053 mm in length and 1798 mm in width, with a height of 1440 mm) makes it an ideal choice for city driving and parking in tight spaces. Despite its smaller dimensions, the Clio offers a functional trunk capacity ranging from 301 to 391 liters depending on the configuration, balancing style with practicality.
When it comes to engine options, the Ford Puma is equipped with petrol MHEV (mild hybrid electric vehicles). The Puma offers power outputs that range from 125 to 160 HP. Its turbocharged 1.0-liter engine provides lively performance with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.4 seconds for the more powerful variants. With consumption ratings between 5.4 and 6 L/100km, the Puma is relatively efficient for an SUV, emitting CO2 levels ranging from 121 to 136 g/km.
The Renault Clio boasts a more diverse engine lineup, including full hybrid, petrol, and LPG options, with power outputs ranging from 67 to 143 HP. Its full hybrid model not only enhances fuel efficiency (as low as 4.3 L/100km) but also helps achieve lower CO2 emissions, starting at just 97 g/km. The acceleration can reach 100 km/h in as fast as 9.3 seconds, proving the Clio is no slouch on the road.
Both vehicles feature front-wheel drive configurations, making them nimble and responsive. The Ford Puma offers either a manual gearbox or an automatic dual-clutch transmission, catering to personal preferences for driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio incorporates automatic, manual, and even a CVT option for its hybrid model, providing versatility for different driving styles.
As driving technology evolves, both models prioritize safety and connectivity. The Ford Puma is equipped with Ford's latest driver-assistance features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a comprehensive infotainment system with smartphone integration.
Meanwhile, the Renault Clio steps up to the plate with a user-friendly infotainment system, incorporating a larger touchscreen and seamless smartphone connectivity. With advanced safety features such as emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring, the Clio ensures a secure driving experience.
Choosing between the Ford Puma and Renault Clio largely depends on consumer needs. The Puma, with its sporty SUV allure and mild hybrid technology, appeals to those seeking a higher driving position and extra cargo space. Conversely, the Clio shines with a variety of efficient engines, compact design, and advanced tech features, ideal for urban dwellers.
Ultimately, both models embody innovative engineering and stylish design, showcasing the capabilities of modern automobiles. Whichever you choose, both the Ford Puma and Renault Clio promise to deliver a blend of performance, comfort, and technology.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24800 - 34800
£
|
Price
about 15800 - 23000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.7
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
364 - 376
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
43
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
121, 129, 128, 136, 0
g/km
|
co2
97 - 130
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 42
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563
kg
|
Curb weight
1124 - 1331
kg
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523
L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391
L
|
Length
4186 - 4226
mm
|
Length
4053
mm
|
Width
1805
mm
|
Width
1798
mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555
mm
|
Height
1440
mm
|
Payload
367 - 469
kg
|
Payload
365 - 406
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, LPG
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
125 - 168
HP
|
Power HP
67 - 143
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 17.1
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 174
km/h
|
Torque
170 - 290
Nm
|
Torque
95 - 205
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
92 - 124
kW
|
Power kW
49 - 105
kW
|
Engine capacity
999
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598
cm3
|
Top speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Top speed
160 - 174
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.