VS

MG MG3 vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (194 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Renault Clio?

MG MG3 vs Renault Clio: Key differences

MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • moderately more power
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more efficient
  • barely lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

MG3

MG MG3 vs Renault Clio: The Battle of Compact Hatchbacks

The compact hatchback segment has always been a hotbed for innovation and performance, attracting drivers who seek efficiency without sacrificing style. Today, we’ll delve into a detailed comparison between the MG MG3 and the Renault Clio. Both vehicles offer a blend of cutting-edge features, fuel efficiency, and practicality, and it’s time to see how they stack up against each other in various aspects.

Clio

Performance and Engine Options

The MG MG3 is equipped with a powerful 1.5-liter full hybrid engine that boasts an output of 194 HP (143 kW), allowing it to reach 0-100 km/h in just 8 seconds. With a top speed of 170 km/h, the MG3 delivers a satisfying driving experience for those who appreciate a bit of thrill on the road. The car's fuel consumption stands impressively at 4.4 L/100km, complemented by a CO2 emission of 100 g/km, placing it squarely in the ‘C’ efficiency class.

On the other hand, the Renault Clio presents a more diverse engine lineup, featuring options ranging from a 1.0-liter petrol to a more potent 1.6-liter hybrid. This offers a power range up to 143 HP, with various configurations achieving different fuel efficiencies, such as the low of 4.3 L/100km for its most efficient variant. The Clio’s acceleration varies, with the quickest version hitting 0-100 km/h in about 9.3 seconds, slightly behind the MG3 but still impressive in its own right.

MG3

Interior and Comfort

Both hatchbacks are designed to accommodate five passengers comfortably, but the interior experience varies significantly. The MG3 features a spacious cabin with a trunk capacity of 293 liters, making it practical for everyday use. Moreover, it scores high on modern infotainment with features that appeal to tech-savvy users.

The Renault Clio, however, edges ahead with a slightly larger trunk capacity of 301 liters and an overall refined interior quality. The Clio's 2024 model year brings additional tech features and a more driver-centric cockpit, enhancing the overall user experience.

Clio

Design and Dimensions

In terms of size, the MG MG3 measures 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and stands at 1502 mm high. Its design is modern and aggressive, appealing to younger buyers looking for a vehicle that makes a statement. The five-door configuration adds practicality while enhancing its sporty looks.

The Renault Clio, while slightly shorter at 4053 mm in length, is marginally wider at 1798 mm and lower at 1440 mm. Its aesthetic is chic and sophisticated, featuring sleek lines and a contemporary design that sets it apart in urban settings. The compact nature of the Clio makes it exceptionally maneuverable, ideal for tight city environments.

MG3

Safety and Technology

Safety is paramount in today’s automotive landscape, and both the MG MG3 and Renault Clio have prioritized driver and passenger security. The MG3 comes equipped with a comprehensive safety suite, including multiple airbags and electronic stability control.

Conversely, the Clio includes several advanced driver-assistance systems and has received high safety ratings, further ensuring peace of mind for its occupants. Features like lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control are available on newer models, setting a benchmark in the segment.

Clio

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

Both the MG MG3 and Renault Clio present compelling offerings in the compact hatchback segment. The MG3 excels in performance and modern technology, while the Clio shines with superior interior quality and a broader range of engine choices. Your choice depends largely on your preferences: if you value performance and innovative features, the MG3 could be the right fit; if you prefer a refined interior and robust safety features, the Clio might be your best bet.

Ultimately, a test drive of both models will help you decide which compact hatchback best fits your lifestyle and driving preferences. Happy driving!

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
MG MG3
MG MG4
VS
If you're after cheap thrills and nimble city driving, the MG3 is the plucky choice — inexpensive, quirky and perfect for tight car parks. But for real-world practicality, range and a more modern feel, the MG4's stylish hatch and EV tech make it the smarter buy for daily drivers who want a bit of …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MG3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG MG3 is moderately cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Renault Clio costs 17,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,637 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the MG MG3 with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers moderately more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Clio delivers clearly more torque with 190 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 42 Nm more.

MG3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is barely lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,237 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries barely more – 463 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
details
MG MG3
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG MG3

The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.

details
KV-1-1
Left-Back-30°-1
Front-Row-Space-1
Trunk-3

Reviews MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Giorgio catacchio
20 Sept 2025, 00:08:28

I've owned the MG3 Hybrid for a year — I travel a lot, never a dull moment; comes fully loaded as standard, incredible acceleration, etc.

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
The Hyundai i10 is a pocket-sized urban pro — cheeky on fuel, effortless to park and surprisingly roomy for its class, ideal if your daily grind is dodging bollards and squeezing into parallel spaces. The Renault Clio, by contrast, plays the grown-up card with sharper styling, a nicer interior and …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of the superminis, the Citroën C3 and Renault Clio each bring their unique flair to the table. The C3 impresses with its distinctive design and customizable features, attracting those who prioritize style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Clio excels in driving dynamics and interior …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Renault Clio and Toyota Yaris both stand out in the compact car segment, each offering distinct advantages for urban driving. The Clio impresses with its stylish design and exceptional fuel efficiency, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and running costs. Meanwhile, the Yaris shines …
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive segment of compact hatchbacks, the Hyundai i20 and Renault Clio stand out with distinctive attributes. The Hyundai i20 impresses with its tech-laden interior and efficient performance, making it a practical choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio offers a blend …
Dacia Duster
Renault Clio
VS
In the realm of budget-friendly options, the Dacia Duster and Renault Clio stand out with their distinct appeals. The Duster, known for its rugged stance and off-road capabilities, caters to those seeking adventure without breaking the bank. On the other hand, the Clio, with its refined design and …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who crave a more dynamic experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek aesthetics and practicality, offering a more refined ride and …
MG MG3
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
92 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
4,116 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
1,451 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Payload
373 - 448 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
MG
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the MG MG3?

The MG MG3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.