VS

Fiat 500 vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (118 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat 500 or Renault Clio?

Fiat 500 vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Fiat 500

3.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly lighter
details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

500

A Clash of Compact Legends: Fiat 500 vs Renault Clio

When it comes to compact cars, two names stand out prominently in the automotive landscape: the Fiat 500 and the Renault Clio. Both are celebrated for their distinct styles, innovations, and efficiency. However, there are substantial differences that could sway potential buyers depending on their priorities. Here, we dive into a detailed comparison of the technical aspects and innovations that define these iconic hatchbacks.

Clio

Design and Dimensions

The Fiat 500 continues to carry its signature retro charm with compact dimensions at 3,632 mm in length, 1,683 mm in width, and 1,527 mm in height. It is designed to be a nimble city car, perfect for navigating tight urban spaces. In contrast, the Renault Clio offers a more contemporary design, with slightly larger dimensions of 4,053 mm in length, 1,798 mm in width, and a height of 1,440 mm, providing a bit more presence and interior space on the road.

500

Powertrain and Performance

The Fiat 500 embraces modernity with its electric powertrain, producing 118 HP and a torque of 220 Nm. It boasts a seamless driving experience with its reduction gearbox and front-wheel-drive configuration. The electric model offers an impressive range of up to 321 km, making it a strong choice for those seeking environmentally friendly transportation.

On the other hand, the Renault Clio offers more diversity in its engine types, including full hybrid, petrol, and LPG options. Its most potent hybrid configuration churns out 143 HP with 205 Nm of torque, allowing for a robust driving experience without compromising on fuel economy—consumption is just 4.3 L/100km for the hybrid variant. The Clio’s versatility gives it an edge for drivers who want options that align with their preferences or local fuel availability.

Clio

Interior and Comfort

Inside, the Fiat 500 is designed to accommodate four seats, with a trunk capacity of 185 L, reflecting its focus on optimizing space within its subcompact form. Despite the limited seating, the 500 remains a favorite for those who value style and compactness over size.

The Renault Clio, with its capability to seat five passengers and a more generous trunk space of 301 L, is perhaps better suited for families or those requiring additional cargo space. The Clio prioritizes comfort and practicality while maintaining a stylish interior layout.

500

Efficiency and Environment

In terms of environmental impact, the Fiat 500 shines with a CO2 emission rating of 0 g/km, attributable to its all-electric nature. This positions the car firmly within the highest CO2 efficiency class of A, making it an exceptional choice for eco-conscious drivers.

While the Renault Clio’s emissions vary depending on the engine choice, it still presents a competitive offering with CO2 outputs as low as 97 g/km for the hybrid model, characterized by an efficiency class of C, which is commendable for a hybrid vehicle of its size.

Clio

Conclusion: Choosing Your Compact Companion

Ultimately, the choice between the Fiat 500 and the Renault Clio boils down to individual needs and preferences. The Fiat 500 appeals to those looking for a chic, eco-friendly city car, whereas the Renault Clio provides versatility, space, and a variety of powertrain options for those who might frequently venture outside the city. Both vehicles exhibit a blend of innovation and tradition yet cater to distinct aspects of modern driving demands.

Frequently compared as well

Fiat 500
Fiat Panda
VS
The Fiat 500 is a cheeky, retro-styled city charmer that wraps bright personality and nimble handling into a compact package ideal for urban life. By contrast, the Fiat Panda trades glamour for practicality — roomier, tougher on rough roads and far more usable for families or weekend escapes, so …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

500

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Clio is marginally cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Fiat 500 costs 17,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 77 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Fiat 500 with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers clearly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 118 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Fiat 500 takes 9 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Fiat 500 delivers moderately more torque with 220 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

500

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Clio offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat 500 is only slightly lighter – 1,130 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 72 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers significantly more boot space – 327 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 142 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries visibly more – 463 kg compared to 325 kg. That’s a difference of about 138 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
details
Fiat 500
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Fiat 500

The Fiat 500 is a cheeky, retro‑styled city car that turns heads with its iconic looks and playful personality. Perfect for weaving through tight streets and easing into tiny parking spots, it’s aimed at buyers who want style and character more than grand touring prowess.

details
190624_F_500_Lounge_MY2020_06
190624_F_500_Lounge_MY2020_10
190624_F_500_Lounge_MY2020_03

Reviews Fiat 500

3.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
Reijo Muhonen
28 Feb 2026, 16:46:06

I've owned both cars, and I still end up with the Fiat 500 — it always puts me in a good mood. For longer trips I take the train.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Fiat 500
Fiat 600
VS
Small Italian icons go head-to-head as the cheeky Fiat 500 takes on the underrated Fiat 600 — two compact cars with very different personalities and practical promises. Whether you want head-turning city agility or a bit more space and sensible family use, this duel will show which little Fiat …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
The Hyundai i10 is a pocket-sized urban pro — cheeky on fuel, effortless to park and surprisingly roomy for its class, ideal if your daily grind is dodging bollards and squeezing into parallel spaces. The Renault Clio, by contrast, plays the grown-up card with sharper styling, a nicer interior and …
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who crave a more dynamic experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek aesthetics and practicality, offering a more refined ride and …
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive segment of compact hatchbacks, the Hyundai i20 and Renault Clio stand out with distinctive attributes. The Hyundai i20 impresses with its tech-laden interior and efficient performance, making it a practical choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio offers a blend …
Fiat 500
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the battle of compact city cars, the Fiat 500 and Suzuki Swift each bring their unique flair to the table. The Fiat 500 is celebrated for its iconic retro design and customizable options, appealing to those who value style and individuality. On the other hand, the Suzuki Swift boasts a peppy …
Fiat 500
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,100 - 27,400 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 14.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
190 - 331 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 121 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,130 - 1,475 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
183 - 185 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,683 - 1,684 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
250 - 325 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
65 - 118 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 16.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
92 - 220 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
48 - 87 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Renault
Is the Fiat 500 offered with different drivetrains?

The Fiat 500 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.